Re: Low cost housing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Brian Bartholomew (bb![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 11:13:33 -0700 (PDT) |
| 'I'm not investing $XXXK over YY years to live next to a Katrina | cottage.' > This is why I think low cost cohousing has to be built with the > whole community as low cost housing because in the end it affects > resale values to have a $350,000 house next to a $60,000 house, no > matter how nice it is. Why would a lower priced house affect resale values? Oh. One of *them* moved in. There goes the neighborhood. Have you see the organic gardening cohouser at the end of the block? I heard they're building a straw bale house. Ewwww!! Quick, call the sheriff to run them off. We don't want their kind here. The goal of laws which ban low-cost housing is to prevent *them* from moving in. Zoning is a violation of civil rights, both in intent and in practical effect. The phrase "affects resale values" admits there is prejudice in society. We shouldn't enshrine prejudice in law. ----- > Since most people who buy homes that expensive are also carrying > huge mortgages. They can't afford a home that is worth less than the > mortgage, even if the bank loans them money for it in the first place. Everyone involved is an adult. Homeowners are at liberty to buy a loan with a high debt to income ratio, and they are free to lose their equity if they can't make the payments. Brian
- Low cost housing, (continued)
-
Low cost housing Brian Bartholomew, May 13 2008
- Re: Low cost housing James Kacki, May 13 2008
-
Re: Low cost housing Brian Bartholomew, May 13 2008
- Re: Low cost housing Sharon Villines, May 13 2008
- Re: Low cost housing Brian Bartholomew, May 14 2008
- Re: Low cost housing Bruce Shimizu, May 14 2008
- Re: Low cost housing Mark Harfenist, May 14 2008
- Re: Low cost housing Brian Bartholomew, May 15 2008
- Re: Low cost housing Matthew Whiting, May 15 2008
-
Low cost housing Brian Bartholomew, May 13 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.