Re: Thank you from a new community!
From: Sharon Villines (sharonsharonvillines.com)
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 06:41:35 -0700 (PDT)

On Jun 23, 2008, at 2:13 PM, Gerald Manata wrote:

How much does geography,for example, the local surrounding politics and culture matter?

I think geography makes a big difference. When I look at the maps for lot development, the first thing I see is how far it is from one end to the other and how far some units are from the common house. We are much closer together -- across a city block but not a large one. I notice a marked difference in my relationships with the people in townhouses on the green in the front half of the community. We are in the 3-4 story flats and duplexes on the back. Unless I've been on a team with them, or they have been here since the beginning, I have few relationships with those "in the suburbs." With the exception one whose children I'm adopted as grandchildren, they never drop-in.

People, and kids, just drop in much more in the stacked units. And the people who sit in the piazza are more likely to be the people in the stacked units which surround the piazza. We also surround the commonhouse and are more likely to be in it.

If I were designing a new community, I would build all the units up, not out. And around a central piazza, possibly covered. With excellent sound barriers in the walls and floors. Our larger stacked units are duplexes with three bedrooms and two baths upstairs and a half bath downstair -- some people left out the bath upstairs or put a full bath downstairs.

Since the stacked units are behind security system with a keypad entrance, we can also leave our doors open which makes "knock and come in" more possible and drop-ins more casual. And allows kids to run from one apartment to another or to the take-it or leave it table or to each other's home. I've had people come in and see that I was taking a nap and leave locking the door behind them.

Some of our units have stairs up to the second floor and the residents say no one drops in. They also have a second flight of stairs inside so it is hard for them to hear knocking. The townhouses have the same issue. If they are upstairs they can't hear. If the doorbells are loud enough to reach upstairs they bother the neighbors.

Is it just "blind luck" as to what kind of people just happen to join together that is the principle determiner as to the "conservative" or "liberal" nature of the community?

i don't think there are any conservatives in cohousing. We do have some conflicts between those who want the place to look like new or better and those who are happy with do it yourself less than professional paint jobs and floors that are past needing refinishing like others think. Some are more politically active and further left and they did have to back off. They were pretty much in everyone's face in the beginning, expecting the community to be just like them. Some have political signs (as in NUMEROUS) in their windows and doors which others don't like but we have gotten used to it. No one disagrees with the sentiments expressed, just the look of it.

I don't think it is luck. I tell people who ask that it is like family. Some people you love, some you can't bear and avoid, and some you only see on holidays. In times of stress, however, pretty much everyone pulls together. But there are also times when i've wanted to say, I'll cook the dinner if you will take it over --- I can't bear another of those meandering conversations.

And in our community, many more people than usual, i think moved in just wanting an apartment and were relatively cheap with prices that were set two years before move in and an excellent location. And parking included with no fees. Rare in complexes in DC, although the new codes do require some but they often charge extra for them so the rents can go up and up.

Does a complex where most people are from outside the area, as opposed to one where most people are from the target area and perhaps already know each together for years create a measurable difference in the operation of a community?

I would say that of of 43 units, 3 came from completely out of state. Some groups of 2 had known each other before, three of friends sets having lived together in group houses or attending the same church or synagog. And some people knew people who told them about it but it may have been as casual a contact as someone dropped into their office off the street. The backgrounds are very diverse. And perhaps a greater number than usual have moved out. 8 of 43 have changed hands, two twice.

It think it is the intention that makes the difference. We have almost no process work or conflict resolution, although I think we need it. And some people interact very little or primarily with one other household in the community. Some people are relatively inactive with the spouse being very involved.

Have the older cohousing complexes actually seen an evolution in attitudes, lifestyle, methods/rules of interpersonal engagement-the community's subculture-in its members over the years? This would make an interesting research project.

Yes, people are generally less in other peoples faces about their own interests. Not out of respect particularly but because it didn't work to convert ohters and everyone got warn down. We all moved in with expectations about what it would be like and those have probably all altered with reality.

I moved in wanting a large community because I have sharp edges and need space, and others need distance from me. But now I wish for a much smaller community where it doesn't drift into a hierarchy to keep things on track and we can develop a true consensus on issues. With 65 adults we are too big and too diverse to do consensus the way we used to. And it was never easy -- 5-8 meetings to reach consensus on some policies.

I guess  people are just persistent.

Sharon
----
Sharon Villines
Takoma Village Cohousing,Washington DC
http://www.takomavillage.org




Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.