Re: Partnering with organisations with conflicting goals | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Yusuf Pisan (yusuf.pisan![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 13:57:46 -0800 (PST) |
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Hans Tilstra <hans.tilstra [at] rmit.edu.au> wrote: > > My hypothesis is that there is a significant difference between people drawn > to cohousing compared to those encouraged to join. > You should limit the scope of your hypothesis both in terms of region (Victoria, Australia) and time (2003-2013). Cohousing in USA is very different than what it is in Australia and will probably look very different in 50 years time. Co-housing in Australia is often seen as "Co-operative Housing" which often refers to housing that is rented from the government. A good example of this is at http://www.australia.coop/artman2/publish/VIC_58/Co-operative_Housing_247.php The SouthEast Housing Co-operative (SEHC) is non-profit, community based co-operative responsible for managing 150 long term rental housing properties in the southern and eastern metropolitan area of Victoria ... SEHC leases rental properties from the Department of Human Services on a permanent basis under a head lease arrangement. The properties are sub-let to low income families and individuals that meet the Department of Human Services income and eligibility criteria.... Co-housing in USA has a very different flavor. There is often no government involvement and even when there is government involvement it is still not as direct as "leasing out" the property. Co-housing in Denmark also has a very different flavor although I do not know enough about that movement to articulate the differences. Even within Australia there are very large variations between communities formed as eco-villages and/or co-housing. > There is a risk that sent message that 'cohousing is good for you' message of > well-intending organisations is received differently by socio-economically > disadvantaged applicants. It also makes a difference to *whom* you are sending the message. In the case of VIC, the message is being specifically sent out to "low income families that meet the Department of Human Services income and eligibility criteria". This is very different than an independent group forming to purchase land, build houses and form a community. Cheers, Yusuf
-
Re: Partnering with organisations with conflicting goals Hans Tilstra, March 2 2009
- Re: Partnering with organisations with conflicting goals Yusuf Pisan, March 3 2009
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.