Consensus and multiple candidates | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: joel . plotkin (joel.plotkin![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:08:42 -0700 (PDT) |
Co-cohousing friends: Here's a question I haven't seen addressed in our consensus resources (Butler and Schaub). We are selecting officers and have multiple candidates for two positions. How might the consensus process work in this situation? In Quaker circles, the problem is avoided by having a Nominating Committee select one name per position to present to the consenting body. Tentatively, we are asking candidates to present themselves and their ideas to the group, and thinking about some straw secret ballots and discussion that might cause some candidates to withdraw. This seems awkward, and seems to rule out Gradients of Agreement that may, in some cases, cause some members to choose the extreme position of not consenting to an individual. What have others done? Joel Plotkin Hundredfold Farm Cohousing Orrtanna, PA
-
Consensus and multiple candidates joel . plotkin, October 29 2009
-
Re: Consensus and multiple candidates Jessie Kome, October 29 2009
-
Re: Consensus and multiple candidates Sharon Villines, November 7 2009
- Re: Consensus and multiple candidates Jeanne Goodman, November 9 2009
- Re: Consensus and multiple candidates Sharon Villines, November 10 2009
-
Re: Consensus and multiple candidates Sharon Villines, November 7 2009
-
Re: Consensus and multiple candidates Jessie Kome, October 29 2009
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.