Re: Any family-based 55+ cohousing in existence? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 05:40:50 -0800 (PST) |
On 12 Dec 2010, at 11:56 PM, balaji [at] ouraynet.com wrote: > movement. Why? Because it takes seniors out of the loop, and constrains > the development of true (i.e., multigenerational) communities. Well, just the opening I needed to engage this subject. I also believe this is not a good trend for cohousing because it is the seniors who do a vital if not largest share of work in the community. Our community would collapse without them. Our most dependable people are over 60. They have more flexible time and have a greater understanding of "larger than my household" responsibilities. They are less overwhelmed by their own lives and have out-grown the expectation that someone else will do it. Many young people are parented to believe that others (parents, teachers, counselors, etc.) are out there and will take care of things. Of our residents who are over 60 there is not one who is a slacker. Not all are hale and hearty but they are all dependable to the best of their ability. None use their infirmities as an excuse for not stepping in when something needs to be done, and those under 50 do when they have a cold. Most don't need to be asked to pitch in. Even those who are 85+ have ongoing leadership and task responsibilities. If it is within their physical ability, they are responsible. This far from true of the under 50 crowd. If people under 50 don't want to stop the drift to senior cohousing, they need to look at the reasons older people want their own spaces. I haven't made a study of this but on my list and on the lists of those I've talked with are: 1. An expectation of adult behavior in some areas of the commonhouse _and_ the grounds all the time and at some time in most areas of the CH. This requires a concept of the CH has something other than a rumpus room for children or an unsupervised student dining hall. 2. Some meals where children are not present so adults can speak not just to be heard but to have uninterrupted conversations and make jokes that someone else may not want their children to hear. And continue them past school day bedtimes. 3. An understanding that on a regular basis there will be events for which parents have to make their own arrangements for their own children. The people over 50 have either raised their children or chosen not to raise them and most probably did not join the community for the sole purpose of assuming responsibility for more. Emergency back up and support for childcare at meetings and workdays is the expected limit on childcare. Some will do much more but should not be expected to nor repeatedly asked. 4. Understand the difference between child-friendly and child-centered. Child-centered is not multigenerational. 5. Parents must remind themselves that their children are not holy causes. No crusades. Cohousing is wonderful but multi-generational takes focus on the needs of all the generations, not just the children and their parents. It would be interesting to have some discussions of how this mult-focus could be assured. How would you structure the budget and the prioritization of activities to ensure that it was being done? Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org
- Re: Any family-based 55+ cohousing in existence?, (continued)
-
Re: Any family-based 55+ cohousing in existence? Bryan Bowen, December 2 2010
- Re: Any family-based 55+ cohousing in existence? Rick Gravrok, December 2 2010
- Re: Any family-based 55+ cohousing in existence? Seanain Snow, December 2 2010
-
Re: Any family-based 55+ cohousing in existence? balaji, December 12 2010
- Re: Any family-based 55+ cohousing in existence? Sharon Villines, December 13 2010
-
Re: Any family-based 55+ cohousing in existence? Bryan Bowen, December 2 2010
- Re: Any family-based 55+ cohousing in existence? Fred H Olson, December 4 2010
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.