Re: rental policy in these economic times | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rodney Elin (hen3ry![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 17:22:54 -0800 (PST) |
On Tue 1 Feb 11 1 Feb 11 2:1051, Diana Carroll wrote:
I've never understood the goal of a policy limiting renters to one or two or however many years. It seems to me that the goal is a low turnover, so if a renter wanted to stay longer than one or two years, that would be a GOOD thing. I'd want a rental policy that would maximize community stability therefore renter longevity.
It is my understanding that this kind of clause limiting renters is a standard drop in to most home owner association bylaws. The larger the percentage of non-owner occupied units, the lower a condominium is valued, and the lower the property value, so the harder it is to sell a unit. I have been told that mortgage companies will not approve a mortgage with more than twenty percent of the units non-owner occupied
- Re: rental policy in these economic times, (continued)
- Re: rental policy in these economic times Sharon Villines, January 31 2011
- rental policy in these economic times Lisa Lackey, January 19 2012
-
Re: rental policy in these economic times R.N. Johnson, February 1 2011
-
Re: rental policy in these economic times Diana Carroll, February 1 2011
- Re: rental policy in these economic times Rodney Elin, February 1 2011
- Re: rental policy in these economic times Kristin Wells, February 1 2011
- Re: rental policy in these economic times Sharon Villines, February 2 2011
- Re: rental policy in these economic times Kristin Wells, February 2 2011
- Re: rental policy in these economic times Diana Carroll, February 2 2011
-
Re: rental policy in these economic times Diana Carroll, February 1 2011
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.