Re: Great moments in consensus -- Moment 2 | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Kay Argyle (Kay.Argyle![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:21:29 -0700 (PDT) |
"... the unclarity of sidethumbing ..." Unclarity occurs only if you don't bother to ask stand-asides for their reasons. "Which is why some communities don¹t allow for side thumbs." Do you mean no stand-asides? Ugh. Maybe such communities are saintly enough to refrain from backbiting about decisions that turn out to have been lousy: "Well, you consensed; you thought it was a good idea, too." Particularly maddening when you did not, and said so at the time, but judged the probably of success, while low, to be nonetheless high enough not to merit blocking. "... partisanship and brute force majority rule at its worst." Majority rule may be at its worst when parties act in bad faith and are more interested in scoring points than solving problems -- but consensus wouldn't function at all. Kay __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5978 (20110323) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com
-
Great moments in consensus -- Moment 2 David Heimann, March 21 2011
-
Re: Great moments in consensus -- Moment 2 R Philip Dowds, March 21 2011
- Re: Great moments in consensus -- Moment 2 Racheli Gai, March 23 2011
- Re: Great moments in consensus -- Moment 2 Kay Argyle, March 23 2011
- Re: Great moments in consensus -- Moment 2 R Philip Dowds, March 24 2011
- Re: Great moments in consensus -- Moment 2 Sharon Villines, March 24 2011
-
Re: Great moments in consensus -- Moment 2 R Philip Dowds, March 21 2011
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.