The "ideology thing" an educational journey | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: kkudia (kkudia![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:25:32 -0700 (PDT) |
I think individually we all need to be true to our convictions as Ann wrote
of hers' but on a National level, there are vast differences in our
membership, not everyone has the same convictions...hence the Mission of an
organization gives focus and clarity and allows for our diversity. At times
we are in the position of choosing the lesser of evils as uncomfortable that
may be, it may be our only choice. Sad but true. This issue has been hard
on our leadership as Craig wrote and as Zev wrote distracting. I think
donating to our National Organization is a thoughtful option. I must confess
the Union efforts not to understand CoHo dilemma and work with the
leadership, undermined my respect for them. I think we have an moral
imperative to challenge injustice wherever we encounter but how?... perhaps
best left up to the individuals, and individual CoHo Communities, unless
there is some mechanism to arrive at a national CoHo consensus.
I am from a working class family; father and mother not union...but step-father and others are, except for one cousin who joined the family through marriage and brought the management perspective. You can imagine some lively discussions. I owe my father and mother's hard work to allow me to further my education and become a professional. They were the first in the family to build their own home (he was a carpenter), so housing issue is of great importance to me. It radically changed our lives. I think we need to pick our battles and focus our resources on Cohousing and let individuals and individual CoHousing Communities take up the various causes that impact who there are and where they live. My thanks for the leadership who tried to work with the Unions on this issue. I was sad to see the Union's response.
My step father (union man drove a van) worked for of all places, yes Sheraton Hotel. I must admit they gave an incredible benefit to all their employees. For a working class family to stay at any Sheraton world wide at a very low cost provided for many incredible family memories. My mother (non-union worked as printer) worked for sub par pay but received profit-sharing/stock in the company...to say the least...her retirement $$$ was incredible. All antidotal and not really pertinent to the current issue but touches on the boarder issues.
I come back to Zev comments and think he has perhaps outlined a top priority challenging CoHo: how to offer affordable housing with falling home prices and stunted economy. I for one, am caught in the dilemma, trying to sell and buy into CoHo. I have seen the value of real estate drop incredibly nationally. Zev is right about Florida market. I recently saw a sign for 2BR home for sale in the Beach area of Daytona for $58,000, that’s hard to compete with when money is dwindling for many.
We accept we need to be involved and we struggle to think through these issues with its complexity of ethical problems and wonder how best to live out our convictions? How can we influence for the common good? I wonder if it is as simple as not crossing a boycott line? Can't there be a better way? Is it not time for both management and unions join to work for the common good?...look at the unemployment rates, look at manufacture base leaving this country etc. Could we not find a third way that benefits management and unions? We listen attentively to each other and deep concerns which lie behind them, we help each other open our minds to alternative viewpoints and refuse to acquiesce in superficial polarizations... for right action often can be more subtle. For me it is the individual CoHo communities that make it realistic to diversify its concerns and actions. Only these communities are in living in the arena that injustice can be effectively challenged, who truly know what is involved. I guess I am still at the level, that needs to distinguish between the individual, community and CoHousing National organization. Individuals are active politically, socially etc as they take appropriate action to challenge injustice in a variety of ways, CoHo communities whose members share particular moral and social concerns will take appropriate action both locally and nationally as they see fit. Certainly CoHousing National organization can take a public stand on some issues (but selectively)...this will depend on the consensus of the communities/members.
So how best to promote our values of human dignity, mutual service, mutual respect? Isn't that the ultimate question in this discussion?
The alternative is stark, industrial strife ; each side seeks their own interests rather than the other's. It is an adversary situation born of suspicion and rivalry, instead of a situation of mutual service born of respect and trust. Confrontation between management and unions is often a reflection of the class divisions which continue to undermine our country's unity. Our two parties are mirror images of the two sides of industry, so that our industrial and class conflicts are perpetuated in our political system. Many people feel underprivileged and alienated...perhaps it is not better salary that motivates, so much as grievance. In my opinion, what confronts CoHo in this labor dispute is how CoHo can replace mutual suspicion by mutual service and competition by cooperation? Even in some measure, perhaps a public statement to the unions, management, newspapers etc? How to assert CoHo values in the middle of this strike? How to show our values in such an atmosphere of bitterness and recrimination? How to be part of the change from the unwholesome "them-us" confrontation? How best to challenge the social injustice; the excessive disparity between the high paid and the low paid? Yes we look back in horror at the oppressive beginnings of the Industrial Revolution and we have come a long way and still have some way to go. Workers have a right to share in decision making (power) and profits on the level of justice and also expediency (increased productivity etc.). Every business must make a profit, but its priority concern needs to be the public whom the company (management, shareholders and workers together) exists to serve. Certainly CoHo communities is where class stratification and a "them-us" mentality are overcome or being overcome; relationships of respect and trust, across social/religious/poltical etc barriers.
So, I am left with the question: How can we work expectantly for greater respect and cooperation in every segment of human society? How can we not acquiesce in industrial conflicts or be pessimistic about resolving it...for CoHousing knows that better relations are possible as we draw upon the greatest resource: humans with an inborn sense of dignity and justice.
I think I may be rambling as I try to think through these issues. Karen Anthony Fl Ann, I liked your quote from Bonhoeffer:"We are not to simply bandage the wounds of victims beneath the wheels of injustice, we are to drive a spoke into the wheel itself."
? Dietrich Bonhoeffer Here's another one:" Genuine ethical discourse is not exhausted in a single proclamation, but requires repetition and continuity; it requires time. Bonhoeffer
As Craig wrote:
As you might imagine, this situation has been a significant challenge and distraction for some of the Coho/US leadership. We are trying to maintain our focus on Cohousing and the National Cohousing Conference. Dealing with anybody's labor issues are outside the scope of our mission. Our mission focus lets us make more progress in helping others understand and grow Cohousing.
as Zev wrote: <Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 05:54:59 -0600 <From: Zev Paiss <I think the situation with the upcoming conference and the hotel strike are distractions to a much graver situation. At this moment in history, despite the growing deep desire to create community across our nation, the reality of economic contraction, high unemployment, falling home prices, and a huge inventory of for sale homes, makes the prospect of building new cohousing neighborhoods at this time extremely challenging....know the equity in their homes (if you are still a homeowner) will not allow them to sell
and purchase a new home in a not-yet-build cohousing community. When I can go buy a perfectly good home in Florida for $25,000 how am I going to convince others to pay 10 times that amount to purchase a new home?...> As Ann wrote:
I would not attend any meeting that was held in a place that actively supported the clubbing of baby seals. Or actively supported banning a woman's right to choose. Or supported the annihilation of Israelis or Palestinians.
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.