Re: dogs in community | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Norman Gauss (normangauss![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 14:48:16 -0700 (PDT) |
David: Are the front yards and fenced back yards owned by the individual unit owners? Norm Gauss Oak Creek Commons Paso Robles, CA -----Original Message----- From: David Bygott [mailto:davidbygott [at] yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 6:43 AM To: cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org Subject: Re: [C-L]_ dogs in community Our community is also getting to grips with the Dog Issue after 8 years. Our current policy has grown out of numerous meetings and a community-wide survey of opinions about various options. Only 8 out of 28 of our households have dogs - several more came with dogs and didn't replace them when they died. We have a central lawn and unfenced front yards which are mostly managed by the community, private back yards mostly fenced, and no dog park within easy walking distance. Originally a community dog park was planned, but most of the community's land is fairly inhospitable (stony, hot, unshaded and full of cacti) and nothing can match our central lawn with shaded sitting areas! Local city laws prohibit dogs off-leash in any public area or unfenced private area, but this reality seems not to concern some owners. Currently we require dogs to be on leash in all public areas, except our 'nature preserve', a large area of natural desert scrub, where they may take their chances with the coyotes. An exception we are considering is that during specific hours in the afternoon, dogs may play free on the lawn, closely supervised by their owners. Dogs have never been allowed in our common house, and everyone respects that. All dog owners are expected and encouraged to pick up poop in public areas and most are very conscientious about this, even to the extent of picking up other dogs' poop when they find it. Naturally, this is more effective when dogs are on leash and owners can see everything their dog does. As yet our rules have no 'teeth' other than social pressure. Individuals who object to unsupervised dogs entering their yards are expected to talk to the owners directly, and owners are expected to be considerate to neighbors' feelings on this. On each of our main entry gates we have a sign showing a picture of a dog on a leash - no words - and most visitors get the idea. My take is that involving the whole community in constructive brainstorming to reach the present compromise has been a healthy process and has fostered tolerance between the dog-owners and the dogless. We too will be interested to hear what works in other communities. David Bygott Milagro Cohousing ________________________________ Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:03:44 -0600 From: Mary McKeever <mckeever7868 [at] gmail.com> ...I'm interested in hearing how different communities deal with dogs in their communities -what are the policies/agreements regarding dogs and how are issues addressed and/or 'enforced'. For example: - can dogs be off-leash in any parts of the community and if so, under what circumstances - can dogs be in the common house and if so, under what circumstances - how does the community deal with dog poop in common areas - how are issues handled when practices are not adhered to by residents and/or visitors.... _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/
- Re: Teeth in Rules [Was dogs in community], (continued)
- Re: Teeth in Rules [Was dogs in community] Joanie Connors, June 25 2011
- Re: Teeth in Rules [Was dogs in community] John Carver, June 25 2011
- Re: Teeth in Rules [Was dogs in community] Sharon Villines, June 27 2011
- Re: Teeth in Rules [Was dogs in community] Norman Gauss, June 26 2011
- Re: dogs in community Wayne Tyson, June 26 2011
- Re: dogs in community Joanie Connors, June 26 2011
- Re: dogs in community Catya Belfer, June 27 2011
- Re: dogs in community Joanie Connors, June 27 2011
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.