Re: Group Think | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 16:23:49 -0700 (PDT) |
On 3 Jul 2011, at 9:59 PM, Joanie Connors wrote: > While groupthink can be totally benign and pleasant, fear is still > connected to it in 2 ways. This discussion of "group think" is remaining strange. There is NO suggestion that group think is benign or pleasant. Every. Group think as Janis defined it — and it is his concept — is when a group fails to see that their views are not balanced or true. They are based in their own feel-good situation which may have no relation to larger reality. The danger of a group feeling great togetherness and shared values is that they fail to see that their decisions are flawed. They are looking though rose-tinted glasses. Group think is a danger not when there is intimidation but when there is so much desire to be one, to be happy, to share a world view. Intimidation, fear, etc., is us used to manipulate people in groups too, but the concept of group think is pointing out the danger on the other side, the we-are-so-wonderful-of-course-we-are-right side. Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org
- Re: Group Think, (continued)
- Re: Group Think Moz, July 3 2011
- Re: Group Think Sharon Villines, July 4 2011
- Re: Group Think Racheli Gai, July 3 2011
- Re: Group Think Joanie Connors, July 3 2011
- Re: Group Think Sharon Villines, July 4 2011
- Re: Group Think Robin Alexander, July 3 2011
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.