Re: Developmental Stages of Cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 06:20:38 -0700 (PDT) |
On 13 Aug 2011, at 1:16 PM, R Philip Dowds wrote: > HIGH PARTICIPATION AND ENGAGEMENT: 15 units, 48%. Regular appearance at > monthly General Meeting (GM); additional pro-active committee work; and > reliability for chores and special projects. Includes founders and newcomers. > MEDIUM: 10 units, 32%. Sporadic appearance at GM, or selective engagement in > committee work and projects; pretty reliable for chores. This is probably quite good. I think ours is about the same if not higher. This is 80%. One of our problems is the move-in expectation that (1) we would do everything ourselves and (2) live at a below middle-class level in terms of aesthetics. The do-everything-ourselves has caused the overload of work for some. The lack of agreement on aesthetics and what is "necessary" has caused conflict. I think if these two things were resolved or prepared for from move-in, things would be easier. But perhaps they can't be. > Some households refuse to engage with others because of unresolved > interpersonal tension. I think resolution of this depends on the presence of someone in the community with the skills and willingness to deal with it, at least when it affects community life. I have learned to just give some people space because we are always in conflict otherwise. We just don't see the world the same way but still have to live together. > Do nothing, change nothing is the final conclusion of much of our dialogue. Frustrating. Those who don't want change or think it is necessary just have to sit on their hands to get what they want. In dynamic governance, all policies expire and have to be renewed giving an opportunity for at least policy issues to be reexamined. > CLIQUES: Don't mean to be grouchy, but I must say that my cohousing > community has turned out to be the worst example of in-group / out-group > syndrome that I've encountered since high school. We don't have this but some do socialize together — the dinner crowd couples — much more more than with others. What I find surprising is that people don't make a concerted effort to attend going away or special birthday parties when they don't like someone or disapprove of their participation in the community. It seems good manners to me to show up. And incredibly obvious in cohousing when they don't. Maybe we need a book of cohousing etiquette. Sharon ---- Sharon Villines A committee is a cul-de-sac down which ideas are lured and then quietly strangled. - Sir Barnett Cocks
- Developmental Stages of Cohousing, (continued)
-
Developmental Stages of Cohousing Thomas Lofft, August 12 2011
- Re: Developmental Stages of Cohousing Sharon Villines, August 13 2011
-
Re: Developmental Stages of Cohousing R Philip Dowds, August 13 2011
- Re: Developmental Stages of Cohousing Wayne Tyson, August 15 2011
- Re: Developmental Stages of Cohousing Sharon Villines, August 15 2011
-
Developmental Stages of Cohousing Thomas Lofft, August 12 2011
- Re: Developmental Stages of Cohousing Fred H Olson, August 15 2011
- Re: Developmental Stages of Cohousing Fred H Olson, August 16 2011
- Developmental stages of cohousing Charles Durrett, August 24 2011
- Re: Developmental Stages of Cohousing Dane Laverty, September 17 2011
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.