Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" [was Report on Survey of Cohousing Communities 2011. Just released. A must read! | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: R Philip Dowds (rpdowds![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 08:04:56 -0700 (PDT) |
I would go further: Members who did not actually participate in the crafting of a proposal should think really hard — like, I mean, really, really hard — before they block it in a community-wide meeting. Weak participation = diminished rights. (Yes?) RPD On Sep 24, 2011, at 9:26 PM, Sharon Villines wrote: > Any person who has an objection must explain it so it can be addressed and > must participate in the process of resolving it.
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks", (continued)
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" R Philip Dowds, September 25 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" R Philip Dowds, September 25 2011
- Reading Wright Rong? Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" Wayne Tyson, September 25 2011
- Re: Reading Wright Rong? Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" R Philip Dowds, September 25 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" [was Report on Survey of Cohousing Communities 2011. Just released. A must read! R Philip Dowds, September 25 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" [was Report on Survey of Cohousing Communities 2011. Just released. A must read! Elizabeth Magill, September 25 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" [was Report on Survey of Cohousing Communities 2011. Just released. A must read! R Philip Dowds, September 25 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" [was Report on Survey of Cohousing Communities 2011. Just released. A must read! drmaryann99, September 25 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" [was Report on Survey of Cohousing Communities 2011. Just released. A must read! Sharon Villines, September 25 2011
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.