Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" [was Report on Survey of Cohousing Communities 2011. Just released. A must read! | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: R Philip Dowds (rpdowds![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 09:09:32 -0700 (PDT) |
Okay, I won't worry about "rights", but I will still have a difficulty with "bad manners". As much as I want to believe in consensus and total equality of all participants, all the time, I still can't fully acclimate myself to the arrogance and bad manners of those who chose to ignore six months of proposal development, but then show up the general meeting of all, and block a proposal because they don't "like" it. If you can't support a proposal ... where were you when your well-intentioned, hard-working neighbors were trying to craft it? RPD On Sep 25, 2011, at 11:30 AM, Elizabeth Magill wrote: > > Remember the goal is a decision everyone supports. Not just a decision. > So worrying about "rights" is the wrong focus. > > I certainly try to either trust the group writing the proposal, or to join > it. > > But no one is helping the group by "going along" and then complaining about, > downplaying, or not following it later. > > -liz 508-450-0431 > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Sep 25, 2011, at 11:04 AM, R Philip Dowds <rpdowds [at] comcast.net> wrote: > >> >> I would go further: Members who did not actually participate in the >> crafting of a proposal should think really hard — like, I mean, really, >> really hard — before they block it in a community-wide meeting. Weak >> participation = diminished rights. (Yes?) >> >> RPD >> >> On Sep 24, 2011, at 9:26 PM, Sharon Villines wrote: >> >>> Any person who has an objection must explain it so it can be addressed and >>> must participate in the process of resolving it. >> >> _________________________________________________________________ >> Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: >> http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ >> >> > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ > >
- Reading Wright Rong? Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks", (continued)
- Reading Wright Rong? Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" Wayne Tyson, September 25 2011
- Re: Reading Wright Rong? Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" R Philip Dowds, September 25 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" [was Report on Survey of Cohousing Communities 2011. Just released. A must read! R Philip Dowds, September 25 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" [was Report on Survey of Cohousing Communities 2011. Just released. A must read! Elizabeth Magill, September 25 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" [was Report on Survey of Cohousing Communities 2011. Just released. A must read! R Philip Dowds, September 25 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" [was Report on Survey of Cohousing Communities 2011. Just released. A must read! drmaryann99, September 25 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" [was Report on Survey of Cohousing Communities 2011. Just released. A must read! Sharon Villines, September 25 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" [was Report on Survey of Cohousing Communities 2011. Just released. A must read! bonnie Fergusson, September 25 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" [was Report on Survey of Cohousing Communities 2011. Just released. A must read! Moz, September 25 2011
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.