Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" [was Report on Survey of Cohousing Communities 2011. Just released. A must read! | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Moz (list![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 16:24:57 -0700 (PDT) |
Sharon said: > I know it feels like a block when a person(s) will not consent ? I find > myself thinking it too. ... But "block" is what _I_ feel. It's my label. > I create the block. I like that formulation. Admittedly I struggle sometimes with the "your reasons keep shifting" and "I'm trying to use different words to explain my objection because we don't seem to have the same understanding". Communication is hard. > An objection must be based on one's personal ability to work > enthusiastically and energetically toward the aim of the > group. An objector is saying "if you make this decision, it > will negatively affect my ability to be fully committed the > community." Any person who has an objection must explain it > so it can be addressed and must participate in the process > of resolving it. What will fix this? Participation in that > process is what distinguishes an objection from a veto. And > the aim of everyone is to resolve it if it can be resolved. I'm quoting that whole block because it seems important to me. There's two core themes there - shared aims and committment to process. One thing that I think Sharon's not emphasising is a willingness to compromise outside of your core values. I think it helps to be enthusiastic about the prospect of compromise. > If there is no shared aim, however, it is unlikely that it > will be resolved in any meaningful or lasting way. What's become obvious to me in the last month or two as our co-ho experiment moves into its third iteration is that the shared aim is crucial, and it's often a long process to discover what peoples aims actually are. Frustrating though it is, a lot of people don't ever sit back and think about what they want and form a strategy for getting it. Instead they just go with the flow and react to each new event in a disconnected way. This makes it hard to guess their reaction to new choices. They find it frustrating that they have to keep explaining their gut reactions against things that are just obviously wrong. It's a lot of work on all sides. Moz
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" [was Report on Survey of Cohousing Communities 2011. Just released. A must read!, (continued)
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" [was Report on Survey of Cohousing Communities 2011. Just released. A must read! R Philip Dowds, September 25 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" [was Report on Survey of Cohousing Communities 2011. Just released. A must read! drmaryann99, September 25 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" [was Report on Survey of Cohousing Communities 2011. Just released. A must read! Sharon Villines, September 25 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" [was Report on Survey of Cohousing Communities 2011. Just released. A must read! bonnie Fergusson, September 25 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" [was Report on Survey of Cohousing Communities 2011. Just released. A must read! Moz, September 25 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" [was Report on Survey of Cohousing Communities 2011. Just released. A must read! Sharon Villines, September 26 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" [was Report on Survey of Cohousing Communities 2011. Just released. A must read! Racheli Gai, September 27 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" [was Report on Survey of Cohousing Communities 2011. Just released. A must read! Wayne Tyson, September 27 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" [was Report on Survey of Cohousing Communities 2011. Just released. A must read! Daniel Lindenberger, September 27 2011
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.