Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" [was Report on Survey of Cohousing Communities 2011. Just released. A must read!
From: Daniel Lindenberger (danielsmallboxcms.com)
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:43:52 -0700 (PDT)
I'm a fan of convergence!


On 27/09/2011 12:33 PM, Wayne Tyson wrote:
CoHo:

I like reconciliation.

WT

----- Original Message -----
From: "Racheli Gai"<racheli [at] sonoracohousing.com>
To: "Cohousing-L"<cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 7:46 AM
Subject: Re: [C-L]_ Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" [was Report on Survey
of Cohousing Communities 2011. Just released. A must read!




I completely agree with Sharon about the need to get away from
'compromise' as a word and as a good thing to work for in the context of
using consensus.

Racheli, Sonora Cohousing, Tucson.

On 09/26/2011 04:37 PM, Sharon Villines wrote:
On 25 Sep 2011, at 7:24 PM, Moz wrote:

One thing that I think Sharon's not
emphasising is a willingness to compromise outside of your
core values. I think it helps to be enthusiastic about the
prospect of compromise.
Perhaps accommodation or pleasing would be the best word here. Compromise
can produce a result that doesn't make anyone happy. Poorly
air-conditioned air, for example, is worse than too hot or too cold. It's
stale and makes no one happy.

Working for the best possible solution for everyone allows you to begin
looking at things in new ways. The compromise mind-set too often produces
manipulation — I want 20 so I'll start with 200 and look like I'm giving
something away when I settle for 30 — or simply halving the difference. I
want 2 meals a week and you want 6 so we have to settle for 4. No one will
be happy. The meal program won't be comprehensive, and those who can only
participate in 2 will feel burdened by working for 4 or not participating
at all (depending on circumstances).

So I tend to avoid the word "compromise".

What's become obvious to me in the last month or two as our
co-ho experiment moves into its third iteration is that the
shared aim is crucial, and it's often a long process to
discover what peoples aims actually are. Frustrating though
it is, a lot of people don't ever sit back and think about
what they want and form a strategy for getting it.
Or they hear everyone talking about things from their own framework and
think everyone is talking  about the same thing.

When we moved in, for example, one of the first things we discovered is
that  people had different basic concepts of the CH:

1. It was to be rented to support CH maintenance, repair, and operating
costs.
2. It was like a hotel lobby, public, with signs everywhere for strangers.
Instructions everywhere.
3. It was like an extension of our living space and residential. If you
don't do it at home, you don't do it here.

We had been discussing the CH for two years, including a charrette, and
these difference never showed up.

Instead
they just go with the flow and react to each new event in a
disconnected way. This makes it hard to guess their reaction
to new choices. They find it frustrating that they have to
keep explaining their gut reactions against things that are
just obviously wrong. It's a lot of work on all sides.
This is a nice characterization. I find that they also don't want
policies. They feel oppressed by "rules" because they "might" limit them
at some future time. Why do we need rules at all? We should just get along
and go with the flow. Hang out, stop obsessing. Just enjoy your neighbors.

That's very hard for me. I like everyone on the same page, even if I don't
like the page.

Sharon
----
Sharon Villines
Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC
http://www.takomavillage.org
_________________________________________________________________
Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at:
http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/




--
-----------------------------------------

Daniel Lindenberger
Windsong Cohousing
www.daniellindenberger.com


Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.