Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 08:48:44 -0700 (PDT) |
> I block! The tone of your message feels like taking relish in vetoing decisions, and refusing to address the difference between a veto and an objection. The reasons you give for vetoing are valid reasons for objecting to a proposal — it's illegal, it affects you negatively, and it compromises your ability to do your job. Objections on this basis would require resolution before you could consent. But if you refuse to discuss resolution, then you are vetoing and not being helpful. Sharon ---- Sharon Villines, Washington DC "The truth is more important than the facts." Frank Lloyd Wright
- Re: Report on Survey of Cohousing Communities 2011. Just released. A must read!, (continued)
-
Re: Report on Survey of Cohousing Communities 2011. Just released. A must read! S. Kashdan, September 24 2011
- Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" [was Report on Survey of Cohousing Communities 2011. Just released. A must read! Sharon Villines, September 24 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" [was Report on Survey of Cohousing Communities 2011. Just released. A must read! Sharon Villines, September 24 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" R Philip Dowds, September 25 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" Sharon Villines, September 25 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" R Philip Dowds, September 25 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" R Philip Dowds, September 25 2011
- Reading Wright Rong? Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" Wayne Tyson, September 25 2011
- Re: Reading Wright Rong? Re: Consensus, Majority Vote, "Blocks" R Philip Dowds, September 25 2011
-
Re: Report on Survey of Cohousing Communities 2011. Just released. A must read! S. Kashdan, September 24 2011
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.