Delphi Method [was Consensus, Majority vote, blocks | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 06:18:52 -0700 (PDT) |
> "Pro-active facilitation and the Delphi Method could get us over some of > these humps." From Wikipedia" > The Delphi method is a structured communication technique, originally > developed as a systematic, interactive forecasting method which relies on a > panel of experts. > > In the standard version, the experts answer questionnaires in two or more > rounds. After each round, a facilitator provides an anonymous summary of the > experts’ forecasts from the previous round as well as the reasons they > provided for their judgments. Thus, experts are encouraged to revise their > earlier answers in light of the replies of other members of their panel. It > is believed that during this process the range of the answers will decrease > and the group will converge towards the "correct" answer. In Europe, more > recent web-based experiments have used the Delphi method as a communication > technique for interactive decision-making and e-democracy. > > Delphi is based on the principle that forecasts (or decisions) from a > structured group of individuals are more accurate than those from > unstructured groups. This has been indicated with the term "collective > intelligence". The technique can also be adapted for use in face-to-face > meetings, and is then called mini-Delphi or Estimate-Talk-Estimate (ETE). I hadn't known the name of this method so I looked it up. I find Wikipedia to be the best and fastest first source on almost anything. Rounds are also designed to achieve this result but I think the anonymous written summaries are best. More objective and focused. No influence of body language or favored sources. You have to do it several times because people will say I don't see my comments in your summary. In fact, people change from moment to moment and sometimes don't see their ideas in even a verbatim transcription of what they said. By having a written document, people also begin to converge on a common l language. There is a version of this in Japan where a written document (report, letter, etc.) is circulated and edited by each person without notes or attribution — none of those horrid track changes. When the document makes the full circle with no edits, it is complete. Sharon ---- Sharon Villines, Washington DC "Behavior is determined by the prevailing form of decision making." Gerard Endenburg
- Re: Consensus, Majority vote, blocks, (continued)
- Re: Consensus, Majority vote, blocks Sharon Villines, September 26 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority vote, blocks Kay Argyle, September 28 2011
- Re: Consensus, Majority vote, blocks R Philip Dowds, September 29 2011
- Delphi Method [was Consensus, Majority vote, blocks Sharon Villines, September 30 2011
- Delphi Method [was Consensus, Majority vote, blocks Sharon Villines, September 29 2011
- Re: Delphi Method [was Consensus, Majority vote, blocks R Philip Dowds, September 29 2011
- Re: Delphi Method [was Consensus, Majority vote, blocks Kay Argyle, September 30 2011
- Re: Delphi Method [was Consensus, Majority vote, blocks R Philip Dowds, September 30 2011
- Re: Delphi Method [was Consensus, Majority vote, blocks Muriel Kranowski, September 30 2011
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.