Re: Delphi Method [was Consensus, Majority vote, blocks | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Kay Argyle (Kay.Argyle![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:02:01 -0700 (PDT) |
"Our participatory groups cannot and will not (or should not) converge to the idiosyncratic interpretation of a single summarizer." >From the description I read, I believe the military version uses a panel to provide feedback, not a single summarizer. While panel members will still have idiosyncratic interpretations, there will be a greater tendency for the biases to cancel each other out. Kay
- Re: Consensus, Majority vote, blocks, (continued)
- Re: Consensus, Majority vote, blocks R Philip Dowds, September 29 2011
- Delphi Method [was Consensus, Majority vote, blocks Sharon Villines, September 30 2011
- Delphi Method [was Consensus, Majority vote, blocks Sharon Villines, September 29 2011
- Re: Delphi Method [was Consensus, Majority vote, blocks R Philip Dowds, September 29 2011
- Re: Delphi Method [was Consensus, Majority vote, blocks Kay Argyle, September 30 2011
- Re: Delphi Method [was Consensus, Majority vote, blocks R Philip Dowds, September 30 2011
- Re: Delphi Method [was Consensus, Majority vote, blocks Muriel Kranowski, September 30 2011
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.