Time Limits in Rounds | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 15:42:32 -0700 (PDT) |
On 7 May 2012, at 6:34 PM, Wayne Tyson wrote: > One of the deadliest phenomena in group dynamics is the concentration of > power, including that of "facilitators." Rather than time limits alone, may > I suggest that when the time limit is up that the speaker (by convention) > stops and calls for a "sense of the group" vote on whether or not the group > wishes her or him to proceed I agree on the problem of facilitocracies in many consensus decision-making groups. But this stopping for permission would break the flow of the round and would take an incredible amount of time. The speaker would probably be done by the time the group discussed and decided this. Better that each person have a sense of the room themselves and how long each person can speak and still hold a meeting or have time to make a decision. Sharon ---- Sharon Villines, Washington DC "Behavior is determined by the prevailing form of decision making." Gerard Endenburg
-
Doing Rounds Sharon Villines, May 5 2012
-
Re: Dynamic Governance-Sociocracy workshop June 15-16 inBoston MA Re: Doing Rounds Sense of the Group Wayne Tyson, May 7 2012
- Time Limits in Rounds Sharon Villines, May 7 2012
- Re: Time Limits in Rounds Wayne Tyson, May 7 2012
-
Re: Dynamic Governance-Sociocracy workshop June 15-16 inBoston MA Re: Doing Rounds Sense of the Group Wayne Tyson, May 7 2012
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.