Re: Communes and Survivalists | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Stephanie (gwtsms![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 11:05:37 -0700 (PDT) |
While there are many valid reasons for regulating construction and land use, I suspect that protecting developer profits is at the top of list. -----Original Message----- From: Sharon Villines <sharon [at] sharonvillines.com> To: Moz <list [at] moz.geek.nz>; Cohousing-L <cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> Sent: Tue, Jul 2, 2013 10:39 am Subject: Re: [C-L]_ Communes and Survivalists On Jul 2, 2013, at 7:04 AM, Moz <list [at] moz.geek.nz> wrote: > but I can see it making life really hard for > adoptive families and for that matter single parents trying to reduce > housing costs. Does that mean that those giant "adopt the foreign > orphans" families can't live in one house? See other message. Just to point out that adopted children are related. Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/
- Re: Communes and Survivalists, (continued)
-
Re: Communes and Survivalists Sharon Villines, July 1 2013
- Re: Communes and Survivalists melanie griffin, July 1 2013
- Re: Communes and Survivalists Moz, July 2 2013
- Re: Communes and Survivalists Sharon Villines, July 2 2013
- Re: Communes and Survivalists Stephanie, July 5 2013
- Message not available
- MS WT Culture Against Society Re: Communes and Survivalists Wayne Tyson, July 6 2013
-
Re: Communes and Survivalists Sharon Villines, July 1 2013
- Re: Communes and Survivalists R Philip Dowds, July 2 2013
- Re: Communes and Survivalists Diana Carroll, July 2 2013
- Re: Communes and Survivalists melanie griffin, July 2 2013
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.