Re: John Trudell and why not park models? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Racheli Gai (racheli![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 11:03:05 -0700 (PDT) |
It's true that there are no "free lunches" (except if you are a big and ugly corporation), but if we lived in a civilized country, our tax money would be going to help people have truly affordable housing, instead of supporting the various industrial complexes our govts. subsidize ("defense", prisons, agro-business, ... you get the idea.) Racheli. On Aug 8, 2013, at 9:09 AM, Ann Zabaldo wrote: > > Hello Marsha and all -- > > Are you talking about what we used to call "mobile home or trailer parks?" > These are great models of cohousing -like development. "Manufactured > housing" a.k.a. "mobile or trailer homes" have come a very long way since the > '50's and '60's. Now, the wheels are just used to move the home to the > building site from whence it never moves again. > > Manufactured housing is an option I've talked about for a long, long time. I > met a man at the 2012 conference in Oakland, CA (another good reason to > attend coho conferences!) who is converting a former campground to cohousing > and also a mobile home park. These are great options. AND ... as at least > two people have pointed out there are trade offs. They are rural or way out > of town. There are zoning regulations in most cities that prohibit mobile > home parks. > > I thank Rebecca Lane for pointing out that cohousing is NOT a financing > model. She suggests using a Community Land Trust to gain affordability. > This is an excellent alternative. BUT this is not free either. Someone has > to put up the money to fund the CLT. Generally, a municipality. So move > where there is an active CLT and start a cohousing community there. > > Look. > > Nobody gets a free lunch in development. The money comes from somewhere. > Affordable housing is subsidized by taxpayers. Your house may be "low cost" > or "below market" to you but someone paid the difference between what you > can afford and what it cost to build the home. You say you can afford a > $200K home. How much cash do you have to fund the development process? > Getting a mortgage to buy a home is only one very small part of the > development process. Someone has to put up the MILLIONS -- yes, MILLIONS -- > of dollars to get the project started. Takoma Village in DC was a $6.5 > million project; Eastern Village was a $15 million project. Who put up that > money? If you're just getting a mortgage ... that's great but that's the end > of the process. > > What I hear you saying Marsha (and others) is that you feel sad and even > angry at not being able to afford the cohousing communities you see built or > being built. This is a way of life you want so much and yet ... not able to > get in the door. Very frustrating. Very frustrating indeed. It's annoying > at the very least, confusing and angering at the other end. > > However, there ARE alternatives for you as people on this list have pointed > out. Daybreak has a house under $200K. You can do retrofit cohousing as a > group in the DC area wants to do -- DC is a very very high rent area of the > country. Yet, this model may very well make it possible for this group to > create their community. The trade off is: time. Since they don't have > money to develop a site from scratch they will take their time to create a > community as houses become available in a single neighborhood. And they > will not be living on Foxhall Rd with the Cafritzes and Bennets. Richmond, > VA is a sweet little city with every amenity of a large urban population. > There is a lot of good housing stock already available in the city. And there > is an active group there. As I've already mentioned, Baltimore is another > city that has been on a major marketing binge for many years to attract > people to rehab urban homes. They have classes, workshops, financing, etc > etc etc. They are set up for first time homebuyers and ready to do business > with you. As a city government, they are doing everything they can to get > people to move to B'more. Plus it's just 45 mins. by train to DC. Many > people live in B'more and work in DC. And ... o my goodness ... Florida. A > zillion town homes for sale ... still. Take your pick. > > I still believe that retro fit cohousing is the best alternative for being > able to create a cohousing community over time with little or no upfront > money beyond the individual homeowner's mortgage. Plus, it's environmentally > sustainable in every sense of the word. You can live in your home right away > and upgrade your home as money becomes available to you. > > I urge you to take advantage of this list, ask for people who believe as you > do to step forward and find out if there is a location of the country to > which you are wiling to move that is not one of the "high rent" districts > such as San Francisco, Washington DC, Boston, NYC, Boulder, Denver, etc. > > Just making an intuitive leap here ... my thinking is ... that this all must > seem completely overwhelming to you. Where to start? How to start? The > process seems daunting. Just trying to find people seems daunting. Start w/ > little steps -- find out who is out there, where you want to live, how much > you can afford, how much cash you will need ... There are professionals who > are willing to help you, can save you lots of time and money but you have to > have money to hire them. > > No free lunches. > > > Best -- > > Ann Zabaldo > Takoma Village Cohousing > Washington, DC > Principal, Cohousing Collaborative, LLC > Falls Church VA > 703-688-2646
-
John Trudell and why not park models? Marsha Beesen, August 7 2013
-
Re: John Trudell and why not park models? Ann Zabaldo, August 8 2013
- Re: John Trudell and why not park models? Diana Carroll, August 8 2013
- Re: John Trudell and why not park models? Racheli Gai, August 8 2013
- Re: John Trudell and why not park models? Ann Zabaldo, August 8 2013
-
Re: John Trudell and why not park models? Ann Zabaldo, August 8 2013
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.