| Re: John Trudell and why not park models? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Racheli Gai (racheli |
|
| Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 11:03:05 -0700 (PDT) | |
It's true that there are no "free lunches" (except if you are a big and ugly
corporation), but if we lived in a civilized country, our tax money would be
going to help people have truly affordable housing, instead of supporting the
various industrial complexes our govts. subsidize ("defense", prisons,
agro-business, ... you get the idea.)
Racheli.
On Aug 8, 2013, at 9:09 AM, Ann Zabaldo wrote:
>
> Hello Marsha and all --
>
> Are you talking about what we used to call "mobile home or trailer parks?"
> These are great models of cohousing -like development. "Manufactured
> housing" a.k.a. "mobile or trailer homes" have come a very long way since the
> '50's and '60's. Now, the wheels are just used to move the home to the
> building site from whence it never moves again.
>
> Manufactured housing is an option I've talked about for a long, long time. I
> met a man at the 2012 conference in Oakland, CA (another good reason to
> attend coho conferences!) who is converting a former campground to cohousing
> and also a mobile home park. These are great options. AND ... as at least
> two people have pointed out there are trade offs. They are rural or way out
> of town. There are zoning regulations in most cities that prohibit mobile
> home parks.
>
> I thank Rebecca Lane for pointing out that cohousing is NOT a financing
> model. She suggests using a Community Land Trust to gain affordability.
> This is an excellent alternative. BUT this is not free either. Someone has
> to put up the money to fund the CLT. Generally, a municipality. So move
> where there is an active CLT and start a cohousing community there.
>
> Look.
>
> Nobody gets a free lunch in development. The money comes from somewhere.
> Affordable housing is subsidized by taxpayers. Your house may be "low cost"
> or "below market" to you but someone paid the difference between what you
> can afford and what it cost to build the home. You say you can afford a
> $200K home. How much cash do you have to fund the development process?
> Getting a mortgage to buy a home is only one very small part of the
> development process. Someone has to put up the MILLIONS -- yes, MILLIONS --
> of dollars to get the project started. Takoma Village in DC was a $6.5
> million project; Eastern Village was a $15 million project. Who put up that
> money? If you're just getting a mortgage ... that's great but that's the end
> of the process.
>
> What I hear you saying Marsha (and others) is that you feel sad and even
> angry at not being able to afford the cohousing communities you see built or
> being built. This is a way of life you want so much and yet ... not able to
> get in the door. Very frustrating. Very frustrating indeed. It's annoying
> at the very least, confusing and angering at the other end.
>
> However, there ARE alternatives for you as people on this list have pointed
> out. Daybreak has a house under $200K. You can do retrofit cohousing as a
> group in the DC area wants to do -- DC is a very very high rent area of the
> country. Yet, this model may very well make it possible for this group to
> create their community. The trade off is: time. Since they don't have
> money to develop a site from scratch they will take their time to create a
> community as houses become available in a single neighborhood. And they
> will not be living on Foxhall Rd with the Cafritzes and Bennets. Richmond,
> VA is a sweet little city with every amenity of a large urban population.
> There is a lot of good housing stock already available in the city. And there
> is an active group there. As I've already mentioned, Baltimore is another
> city that has been on a major marketing binge for many years to attract
> people to rehab urban homes. They have classes, workshops, financing, etc
> etc etc. They are set up for first time homebuyers and ready to do business
> with you. As a city government, they are doing everything they can to get
> people to move to B'more. Plus it's just 45 mins. by train to DC. Many
> people live in B'more and work in DC. And ... o my goodness ... Florida. A
> zillion town homes for sale ... still. Take your pick.
>
> I still believe that retro fit cohousing is the best alternative for being
> able to create a cohousing community over time with little or no upfront
> money beyond the individual homeowner's mortgage. Plus, it's environmentally
> sustainable in every sense of the word. You can live in your home right away
> and upgrade your home as money becomes available to you.
>
> I urge you to take advantage of this list, ask for people who believe as you
> do to step forward and find out if there is a location of the country to
> which you are wiling to move that is not one of the "high rent" districts
> such as San Francisco, Washington DC, Boston, NYC, Boulder, Denver, etc.
>
> Just making an intuitive leap here ... my thinking is ... that this all must
> seem completely overwhelming to you. Where to start? How to start? The
> process seems daunting. Just trying to find people seems daunting. Start w/
> little steps -- find out who is out there, where you want to live, how much
> you can afford, how much cash you will need ... There are professionals who
> are willing to help you, can save you lots of time and money but you have to
> have money to hire them.
>
> No free lunches.
>
>
> Best --
>
> Ann Zabaldo
> Takoma Village Cohousing
> Washington, DC
> Principal, Cohousing Collaborative, LLC
> Falls Church VA
> 703-688-2646
-
John Trudell and why not park models? Marsha Beesen, August 7 2013
-
Re: John Trudell and why not park models? Ann Zabaldo, August 8 2013
- Re: John Trudell and why not park models? Diana Carroll, August 8 2013
- Re: John Trudell and why not park models? Racheli Gai, August 8 2013
- Re: John Trudell and why not park models? Ann Zabaldo, August 8 2013
-
Re: John Trudell and why not park models? Ann Zabaldo, August 8 2013
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.