Re: pee (WAS Designing for Women) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Diana Carroll (dianaecarroll![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 10:40:27 -0700 (PDT) |
Yes and you'll note that I amended my over simplified statement that urine was sterile in the next paragraph (which you cut), explaining that while it can carry some germs it is much less likely a vector than most bodily fluids. Please read the whole message before disagreeing. On Thursday, September 26, 2013, Saunders, Rich wrote: > > > Just when you thought you had all the answers... > > > http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/04/10/study-debunks-myth-that-urine-is-sterile/ >
-
Re: pee (WAS Designing for Women) Eris Weaver, September 26 2013
-
Re: pee (WAS Designing for Women) Joanie Connors, September 26 2013
-
Re: pee (WAS Designing for Women) Diana Carroll, September 26 2013
- Re: pee (WAS Designing for Women) Saunders, Rich, September 26 2013
- Re: pee (WAS Designing for Women) Diana Carroll, September 26 2013
- Re: pee (WAS Designing for Women) Peter Goldstein, September 26 2013
- Re: pee (WAS Designing for Women) Diana Carroll, September 27 2013
- Re: pee (WAS Designing for Women) Karen Scheer, September 27 2013
-
Re: pee (WAS Designing for Women) Diana Carroll, September 26 2013
-
Re: pee (WAS Designing for Women) Joanie Connors, September 26 2013
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.