Re: pee (WAS Designing for Women) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Peter Goldstein (peterhansgoldstein![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 11:00:53 -0700 (PDT) |
Okay, I'mma be that guy. I'm not sure how large this listserv is, but I'm going to estimate roughly a thousand people. It would behoove us to consider which topics are relevant to the list's stated subject and which are better served in individual threads. Have a nice day, Peter Goldstein On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Diana Carroll <dianaecarroll [at] gmail.com>wrote: > > Yes and you'll note that I amended my over simplified statement that urine > was sterile in the next paragraph (which you cut), explaining that while it > can carry some germs it is much less likely a vector than most bodily > fluids. Please read the whole message before disagreeing. > > > > On Thursday, September 26, 2013, Saunders, Rich wrote: > > > > > > > Just when you thought you had all the answers... > > > > > > > http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/04/10/study-debunks-myth-that-urine-is-sterile/ > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ > > >
- Re: pee (WAS Designing for Women), (continued)
-
Re: pee (WAS Designing for Women) Joanie Connors, September 26 2013
-
Re: pee (WAS Designing for Women) Diana Carroll, September 26 2013
- Re: pee (WAS Designing for Women) Saunders, Rich, September 26 2013
- Re: pee (WAS Designing for Women) Diana Carroll, September 26 2013
- Re: pee (WAS Designing for Women) Peter Goldstein, September 26 2013
- Re: pee (WAS Designing for Women) Diana Carroll, September 27 2013
- Re: pee (WAS Designing for Women) Karen Scheer, September 27 2013
-
Re: pee (WAS Designing for Women) Diana Carroll, September 26 2013
-
Re: pee (WAS Designing for Women) Joanie Connors, September 26 2013
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.