Re: Is in-house plumbing and electric a must?
From: Dane Laverty (danelavertygmail.com)
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 09:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 6:57 AM, Philip Dowds <rphilipdowds [at] me.com> wrote:
>
> But cohousing...serves "regular" households... There is no reason to
expect cohousing to be
> "cheaper" than "regular" housing.

Philip, I agree that your statement above accurately represents the world
as it is. However, is there any reason that cohousing couldn't/shouldn't be
cheaper than regular housing? And so I'm interested in exploring the
options available for creating a low-cost cohousing community.

I see Opportunity Village as one possible model worth exploring. Right now,
I'm a suburban homeowner. I work a full-time job, go home in the evenings,
and hang out with my wife and kids for a couple hours before bedtime. I've
got two problems I'm trying to solve:

1. I'm interested in increasing the level of social interaction in my life.
2. Simultaneously, I'm interested in working fewer hours so that I have
more time for friends, family, and pastimes.

Conventional cohousing helps solve the first problem, but not the second
one. If I can find a low-cost cohousing solution that would reduce my
living costs to the point that I could support myself and my family while
working part-time or working from home, then that would solve both my
problems. So that's my motivation for looking at cohousing and other
intentional community models.

Dane

Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.