Re: meeting minutes | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Lynn Nadeau / Maraiah (welcome![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 08:56:26 -0700 (PDT) |
I've been the minute taker and archivist for much of our 25-year project, here at RoseWind Cohousing in Port Townsend WA. Taking minutes is a balance between keeping the flavor and reasoning of discussions, especially those leading to decisions, and providing a concise reference to the most important stuff. The short answer to the question posed is that I rarely keep the speaker's name attached to an idea: "A concern was raised as to whether our insurance company would allow X." Unless there is a specific reason to include identity: "Marge and Jerry are concerned that a shed in that area would shade their vegetable garden." I also often include the names of those with a "soapbox" item, as these tend to be personal opinions, rants, raves, or raising a new issue with an invitation for interested parties to contact them. Two things I've found useful: Near the top of each set of notes I include a Summary: Any decisions that were made get listed here (as well as in the body of the notes). This helps with the reference factor. I keep a copy of the raw notes I take at the meeting, copying and pasting into a working document that evolves into the official minutes. That way, if there arises a later question of interpretation, I can go back and see what the nearly-verbatim raw notes say. Maraiah Lynn Nadeau
-
Re: meeting minutes Lynn Nadeau / Maraiah, September 9 2015
-
Re: meeting minutes Muriel Kranowski, September 9 2015
-
Re: meeting minutes Sharon Villines, September 9 2015
- Re: meeting minutes Muriel Kranowski, September 9 2015
- Re: meeting minutes Sharon Villines, September 9 2015
-
Re: meeting minutes Sharon Villines, September 9 2015
-
Re: meeting minutes Muriel Kranowski, September 9 2015
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.