Re: a question about meeting minutes | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: R Philip Dowds (rpdowds![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 09:19:28 -0700 (PDT) |
And I agree with Sharon here. The outcome or decision is often nuanced, complex or contingent. Unless the decision is succinct and inescapably clear — “Approved.” “No.” Or some such — I find it useful for the recording secretary to read back some literal words: “Here is how I am recording our decision … <read the words> …” It should be no surprise that this approach, even when well executed, can precipitate more debate. Thanks, Philip Dowds Cornerstone Village Cohousing Cambridge, MA > On Sep 9, 2015, at 11:02 AM, Sharon Villines <sharon [at] sharonvillines.com> > wrote: > > I think the minutes should give a sense of the discussion — the issues — and > the outcome. Insisting on recording a clear outcome also pushes the group to > have an outcome — not just wander on to the next topic. This is partly the > job of the person leading the meeting but secretaries can be greatly helpful > in this because they have to write it down.
- Re: a question about meeting minutes, (continued)
- Re: a question about meeting minutes Sharon Villines, September 9 2015
- Re: a question about meeting minutes R Philip Dowds, September 9 2015
- What are membership meetings for? [ was: a question about meeting minutes Sharon Villines, September 10 2015
- Re: a question about meeting minutes R Philip Dowds, September 9 2015
- Re: a question about meeting minutes Elizabeth Magill, September 9 2015
- Language used in decisions Elizabeth Magill, September 9 2015
- Re: Language used in decisions Sharon Villines, September 10 2015
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.