Re: Developer Model of Co-housing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Emilie Parker (emilie.v.parker![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 09:23:52 -0700 (PDT) |
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Kathryn McCamant < kmccamant [at] cohousing-solutions.com> wrote: Katie, I apologize for picking up on a topic that is an offshoot of the initial developer topic question. My quandary is the land, and you address that in your post from a few days ago. Your comments as a experienced developer of cohousing meant a lot to me. You say many cohousing communities came together > > because someone took the initiative to tie up a specific property that > allowed the community to organize a > > round it. > Our community which is currently 10 people (8 households) after 2 years and we seem to be at a standstill on the land -- while we try to grow our group, figure out how much money we have for land in our group, find land, and build our community spirit. We had 50 people in our group when we were organizing around a property owned by the County. We decided to give up on it. That group had not each made a substantial financial contribution (only $50) and very few helped, participated in any way, or came to meetings. When we scheduled the GIB workshop and people saw that they would have to come up with money, 90% didn't continue. We have about 5 of that group left. Now we have more -- 10 wonderful people who have all paid the $475 for the GIB and they really show up and volunteer -- setting up meetings, keeping books, marketing. They are committed to making it happen. It's awesome. But we have no land and so far a bank account of about $35,000 from our group -- not enough to buy most of the land we have been looking at close to our jobs. One of our problems is we fell in love with a piece of land that we've been unable to get a contract on. It's expensive and they want cash and a short closing. So far, not happening. We've been unable to meet the terms the owner wants. I think our strategy will be to see how much our members have to invest in the land at the next meeting and then just find some that is not our ideal but we can get it for the money we have. I really appreciate your comments, Katie, about often losing committed members once the land is secured. Losing people is frightening but may be inevitable and losing members is not the undoing of the vision. I think you are saying the undoing of the vision for a cohousing community is more likely to be not getting land. Putting a piece of land under contract allows a community to organize themselves around it. That's going to be my mantra. ----------------- Emilie Parker emilie.v.parker [at] gmail.com 303-317-4558 main 240-350-8533 cell www.emilieparker.com www.artistscohousing.com www.meetup.com/artists-housing-community "Whatever you can do or dream you can, begin it. Boldness has genius, power and magic in it!" Johann Wolfgang von Goethe It can “escort one to the edge of one’s ignorance,” and launch “a constant process of disorientation and reorientation, taking part in the pleasures, the discomforts, and the conflicts of discovery." historian, Patricia Limerick
- Re: Developer Model of Co-housing, (continued)
- Re: Developer Model of Co-housing Richart Keller, September 4 2015
- Re: Developer Model of Co-housing Sue Ellen Hiers, September 4 2015
- Re: Developer Model of Co-housing R Philip Dowds, September 5 2015
- Re: Developer Model of Co-housing Kathryn McCamant, September 8 2015
- Re: Developer Model of Co-housing Emilie Parker, September 9 2015
- Re: Developer Model of Co-housing R Philip Dowds, September 10 2015
- Re: Developer Model of Co-housing Elizabeth Magill, September 9 2015
- Re: Developer Model of Co-housing Kathryn McCamant, September 9 2015
- Re: Developer Model of Co-housing Sharon Villines, September 10 2015
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.