Re: HOA Insurance
From: John Sechrest (sechrestgmail.com)
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 09:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
You may not need to change the property boundaries but the organizational
boundaries instead.

On May 13, 2016 6:58 AM, "Mac Thomson" <macthomson [at] me.com> wrote:

>
> Thanks Chris. We may end up having to go that route, but around here
> "easily subdivide” is an oxymoron.  :-)
>
> --
> Mac Thomson
>
> Heartwood Cohousing
> Southwest Colorado
> http://www.heartwoodcohousing.com
>
>
> "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys
> to teenage boys."
>         - P. J. O'Rourke
> **********************************************************
>
>
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 10:54:05 -0700
> > From: Chris ScottHanson <cscotthanson [at] mac.com>
> > To: Cohousing-l <cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org>
> > Subject: Re: [C-L]_ HOA Insurance
> > Message-ID: <33BE2509-EAC4-410F-BA29-4EED44339BB3 [at] mac.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain;     charset=utf-8
> >
> > Mac,
> >
> > I suspect you could easily subdivide the property and put the 65 acres
> in different ownership, not in the HOA and segregate the insurance that
> way.  The HOA could then be insured as a simple ?regular HOA? and the
> pasture/farmland could be insured separately under different ownership, not
> confusing the insurance underwriters.
> >
> > Chris ScottHanson
> > (206) 601-7802
> _________________________________________________________________
> Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at:
> http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/
>
>
>

Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.