Re: Use of science/facts in decision making | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 16:15:01 -0800 (PST) |
> On Dec 31, 2016, at 12:46 PM, Elizabeth Magill <pastorlizm [at] gmail.com> > wrote: > > A non-fact discussion would be--sure there'll be worn grass but that won't > lead to erosion so we can have both, green grass and unlimited play areas. This is actually what we have. It’s been a balance of building a stronger lawn with less watering, and periodically marking off an area to be reseeded. So we have a green lawn and a play area. I think, however, that any social activity that purposefully damages the lawn would be stopped. Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org
-
Use of science/facts in decision making Mary English, December 30 2016
- Re: Use of science/facts in decision making Liz Ryan Cole, December 31 2016
-
Re: Use of science/facts in decision making Sharon Villines, December 31 2016
-
Re: Use of science/facts in decision making Elizabeth Magill, December 31 2016
- Re: Use of science/facts in decision making Sharon Villines, December 31 2016
-
Re: Use of science/facts in decision making Elizabeth Magill, December 31 2016
-
Re: Use of science/facts in decision making Mary Baker, Solid Communications, December 31 2016
- Re: Use of science/facts in decision making Elizabeth Magill, December 31 2016
-
Re: Use of science/facts in decision making Alan O'Hashi, December 31 2016
- Re: Use of science/facts in decision making Richard L Kohlhaas, December 31 2016
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.