Re: Question about splitting a community | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2018 11:24:53 -0700 (PDT) |
On Mar 25, 2018, at 2:08 PM, Sharon Villines <sharon [at] sharonvillines.com> wrote: > Mental fatigue. The whole group will be discussing twice as many obstacles. > Having large group support sounds good but it means giving twice as much > support too. > > One the other person is always unemployed or seriously underemployed or in > danger of being unemployed. > > With a community comes all the benefits, but you also share the woes. Sharing > the development woes of two groups at the same time might be too much. I didn’t mean this to sound like the voice of doom. If one household is unemployed there are still 42 others who probably are not. And forming a cohousing group isn’t impossible, obviously, but it requires the full focus of a group on tasks they usually have no experience with. To do it with two groups at a time, even if you regard them as one group, might be too complex. Maybe have social events together; business meetings separately. And everyone welcome to attend all the meetings. Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org
- Re: Question about splitting a community, (continued)
-
Re: Question about splitting a community Bob Morrison, March 21 2018
- Re: Question about splitting a community Ann Lehman, March 21 2018
-
Re: Question about splitting a community Fred-List manager, March 23 2018
-
Re: Question about splitting a community Sharon Villines, March 25 2018
- Re: Question about splitting a community Sharon Villines, March 25 2018
-
Re: Question about splitting a community Sharon Villines, March 25 2018
-
Re: Question about splitting a community Bob Morrison, March 21 2018
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.