Question about Consent Governance | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Chris Terbrueggen (christopher402![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 20:01:45 -0700 (PDT) |
Greetings, We are slowly developing our consent governance in one of our Linden Cohousing committees. There was an objection voiced by a member, who said a second committee member must support a member's objection for it to be a valid objection. They were concerned that one person would block the proposal. I would like to know if any cohousing communities require a second person's support at the committee level. Or, do you honor a single member's objection? Do you work together to see if it's a valid objection based on the aim of the committee and find a solution to the objection? Is there a way to merge the two ideas? We are new to the consent process. I am sure there is a learning curve present in this discussion. There may be personal perceptions of trusting a governance process that is new. Maybe, it's being comfortable with Roberts Rules of Order, which requires a second for some decisions to be made. Thanks, Chris Terbrueggen
-
Question about Consent Governance Chris Terbrueggen, July 16 2018
- Re: Question about Consent Governance Muriel Kranowski, July 16 2018
- Re: Question about Consent Governance David Mencher, July 16 2018
-
Re: Question about Consent Governance Philip Dowds, July 17 2018
- Re: Question about Consent Governance David Mencher, July 17 2018
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.