Re: Contentious issues? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 10:49:10 -0700 (PDT) |
Rob Sandelin used to say parents, pets, poisons. Poisons could be expanded to the more general topic of the environment but it doesn’t begin with a P. Sharon > On Sep 16, 2020, at 12:38 PM, Mabel Liang <mabel [at] twomeeps.com> wrote: > > I think I heard a list from Jim Snyder-Grant of New View Cohousing (Acton , > MA) that included more P's. > > Progeny (= Parenting) > > Pennies (= Money) > > Puffing (= Smoking) > > And yes, we have made it so someone has to go off of our tight urban site in > order to smoke. None of our homes are single detached homes, and smoke > spreads too easily. > > -- Mabel :-) > > mabel [at] twomeeps.com > Mabel Liang > Software Engineer turned Gardener > > On 2020-09-15 19:02, Elizabeth Magill wrote: > >> The causes of conflict >> Pets >> Participation >> Parenting >> Parking >> Past Annoyances >> Plus More.... >> and lately >> Police (and signage about them) >> Also, Nudity, Guns. Smoking. >> Those are the topics with the most controversy. >> Before you have all the members you need the most important controversial >> topics are the ones that will affect new buyers--the things that you want >> later people to *know* and *accept* before they move-in. >> For example, you can't have a policy that says "no guns in any situation" >> if you want a police officer to be allowed to move in. >> If you say "no public nudity" then no public nudists will move in. >> If you say "no outdoor cats" .... >> Are you going to restrict smoking that happens inside homes? In backyards? >> Are you going to make it so people can't have family members that smoke >> visit? >> Each decision is easier in small group, and determines whether later people >> will feel welcome.... >> Which is not to say that it is unwelcoming to state your values ... some, >> different people won't move into your community *unless* you say no public >> nudity or no guns or no outdoor cats. >> Other items are hard to know before you move-in. Somehow it never >> occurred to us that our very young children would ever drive cars. So 2 >> parking places per home seemed totally logical. If we'd made a *policy* >> about that before move-in we'd have to change it later. Because the fact >> is, lots of people aren't going to tell their teens they can't have a car >> just because 12 years ago we made an agreement about it. >> Liz >> Mosaic Commons Cohousing, Berlin, MA >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 6:33 PM Chris Hansen <itschrishansen [at] gmail.com> >> wrote: >> Our recent memorable conflict was about putting political signs with >> messages on them (rather than candidate signs) in front of the property. >> It was protracted and contentious and we eventually came to an agreement >> where a person warns intent giving residents opportunity to object a >> certain number of hours before it will be erected. >> cheers >> Chris >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 1:11 PM fergyb2 via Cohousing-L < >> cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> wrote: >> I agree with Muriel, ignoring never works, what does is careful and >> respectful talking it through. Here at Swans Market we are a small urban >> cohousing Community 20 years after move in and we have never had to use the >> emergency voting option that was put into our bylaws so nervous banks would >> lend to us. >> That's not to say we haven't had our share of contentious issues. >> When we get into trouble it's usually through impatience and rushing to a >> decision in spite of some folks reservations. When you do that, >> resentments build and it becomes harder to reach consensus on the next, >> unrelated issue that comes up. We are so used to rushing to a decision in >> our culture it's hard for people to get used to the amount of time and >> effort required to reach a good decision that everyone understands and can >> live with. There is no substitute for talking it through and really >> listening to each other. We also have brought in outside Cohousing >> professionals to facilitate meetings on occasion when we have gotten stuck. >> A useful strategy I recommend. And facilitator training on consensus >> decision making BEFORE move in so you all start with some basic skills. >> Good luck to you in this adventure we call cohousing. >> Bonnie Fergusson >> Swans Market Cohousing >> Oakland, CA land of the many smokes currently >> Sent from my iPad >> _________________________________________________________________ >> Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: >> http://L.cohousing.org/info >> -- Chris Hansen >> 32 East Village Drive >> Burlington >> Vermont 05401 >> USA >> Ph 603 3988730 >> _________________________________________________________________ >> Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: >> http://L.cohousing.org/info > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://L.cohousing.org/info > > >
- Re: Contentious issues?, (continued)
- Re: Contentious issues? Chris Hansen, September 15 2020
- Re: Contentious issues? Elizabeth Magill, September 15 2020
- Re: Contentious issues? Mabel Liang, September 16 2020
- P.S. Re: Contentious issues? Mabel Liang, September 16 2020
- Re: Contentious issues? Sharon Villines, September 16 2020
- Re: Contentious issues? Chris Hansen, September 16 2020
- Re: Contentious issues? Sharon Villines, September 28 2020
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.