Re: 30% of Income Cohousing [was Unit price and budget questions | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Fred-List manager (fholson![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 07:39:43 -0800 (PST) |
David Mandel <dlmandel [at] gmail.com> is the author of the message below. It was posted by Fred, the Cohousing-L list manager <fholson [at] cohousing.org> after deleting quoted digest and restoring subject line. Digest subscribers, please delete most of quoted digest and restore subject line when replying. NOTE: Digest subscribers can make replying easier by using "auto folders" particularly Gmail and Outlook users. See http://justcomm.org/jc-faq.htm#Q6.5 -------------------- FORWARDED MESSAGE FOLLOWS -------------------- Thanks to Phillip Dowds for such a cogent explanation of why "affordability" is elusive, politicized and why this is mostly a function of our dysfunctionally unequal society. I hope you agree that the answer is to decommodify housing, since it is a basic human need/right. The most important elements of this are massive construction of social(publicly funded) housing of various types and styles, with the emphasis on creating healthy, sustainable communities (drawing on cohousing experience, among other things), and making it attractive to households with incomes from near zero to above median. If done right it really won't matter that some may own (though hopefully mostly through co-ops or in a bifurcated manner with community land trusts) and others rent. Tax incentives that favor single family home ownership will need to go. Some of the uber rich will still be able to play in their mansions, but we'll tax their wealth so heavily that even they will have to consider cutting corners a bit. David Mandel, Southside Park Cohousing, Sacramento
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.