Re: Cohesiveness of community after a sale? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: R Philip Dowds (rphilipdowds![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 16:17:21 -0700 (PDT) |
Homeowner occupancy “turnover rate” statistics are kind of flaky and broad-brush, but decades ago, the rule of thumb for an average was every 6-7 years or so. Now, given the recent stress of the pandemic, plus a very “tight” national housing market, that average is more like 9-10 years. So with 32 units, Cornerstone might anticipate 70-80 unit sales in a 25 year period. ??? Or, if we consider 11 units locked up by founders who refuse to go away, that would be more like 21 units in play, or 40-50 sales transactions. Cornerstone, of course, has not had anything near this turnover rate — which is consistent with my understanding that cohousing turnovers are low and slow compared to the condo market generally. None of which answers your question: Is one-third persistence after 25 years common on Planet Coho? That doesn’t feel wrong to me, but I have no research data. One thing to watch out for is: What’s a “founder”? ——————————— Thanks, Philip Dowds Cornerstone Cohousing Cambridge, MA > On Jul 21, 2025, at 2:38 PM, Ken Winter <kenatsun [at] gmail.com> wrote: > > Interesting. At Sunward Cohousing, also ~25 years old, 14 of 40 units > contain founding fathers and mothers. That's about the same ratio as > Cornerstone! Is 35% some kind of magic number? > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 9:29 AM R Philip Dowds via Cohousing-L < > cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> wrote: > >> My views are pretty similar to Alan’s … although I may have a different >> take on the significance of the founding role. Because it’s not scalable >> into the future. >> >> Today, cohousing in America is still a micro-cult activity: Only a tiny >> fraction of USA residents live in cohousing, or can even find cohousing >> nearby. But I like to picture a future where most small towns have several >> cohousing communities, and cities have dozens or hundreds. Yes, some >> candidate cohousers will always choose to find each other, to learn how to >> be real estate developers, and to create their own brand of brand new >> community. But many others will simply shop around, and select an existing >> community that best serves their lifestyle. These existing communities >> will be 30, 40 or 50+ years old, and the majority of founders will be long >> gone. For better or worse, the character and culture of these >> long-established communities will be, of necessity, self-perpetuating >> and/or self-redefining. >> >> After more than 25 years, only eleven of our 32 Cornerstone units are >> occupied by founders who were active in the development phase — and of >> those founders, a few have substantially decreased their participation over >> time. The culture and practices dominant when my wife and I bought in 18 >> years ago have changed significantly — usually with the encouragement and >> approval of some founders, and despite the resistance of other founders. >> We continue to evolve, and we’ll never be a cohousing mausoleum. I hope. >> In this context, I share Alan’s preference for a “transparent” process that >> familiarizes and educates potential buyers before they commit to joining >> (and shaping) a living, evolving culture. >> >> ——————————— >> Thanks, >> Philip Dowds >> Cornerstone Cohousing >> Cambridge, MA >> >>> On Jul 21, 2025, at 6:45 AM, Alan O'Hashi via Cohousing-L < >> cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> wrote: >>> >>> Cohousers - At my place, the HOA requires buyers to take a tour and have >> an orientation session about cohousing, community participation, etc. >> Buyers attend a team or communit rmeeting, and attend a dinner. We have an >> interest list, but it’s not a great source of qualified potential buyers. >> We assign a community member or two to liaison among the HOA, seller, and >> buyer to set up visits and meetings. Ultimately, it’s up to the seller to >> pick a buyer. So far, our transparent process has worked pretty well. >> Others can chime in here, but generally, my observation is that no >> community has 100 percent ideal cohousers. The only group that can >> self-select is the founding group. Rather than worrying too much about >> future owners. I think it’s most important to correctly pick the initial >> members. >>> >>> Thx, >>> >>> alan o >>> >>> >>> Alan O'Hashi - Cyber Office >>> Buy “A New Dawn at Libby Flats” >>> www.bouldercomedia.com/retail >>> … Colorado..303-910-5782 >>> … Wyoming. 307-232-9373 >>> Typos By iPhone Auto-Mistake >>> _________________________________________________________________ >>> Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: >>> http://L.cohousing.org/info >>> >>> >>> >> >> _________________________________________________________________ >> Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: >> http://L.cohousing.org/info >> >> >> >> > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://L.cohousing.org/info > > >
- Re: Cohesiveness of community after a sale?, (continued)
- Re: Cohesiveness of community after a sale? Stefani Danes, July 20 2025
-
Re: Cohesiveness of community after a sale? Alan O'Hashi, July 21 2025
-
Re: Cohesiveness of community after a sale? R Philip Dowds, July 21 2025
- Re: Cohesiveness of community after a sale? Ken Winter, July 21 2025
- Re: Cohesiveness of community after a sale? R Philip Dowds, July 21 2025
- Re: Cohesiveness of community after a sale? Muriel Kranowski, July 21 2025
-
Re: Cohesiveness of community after a sale? R Philip Dowds, July 21 2025
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.