Re: Preventing cohousing neighborly awareness from becoming surveillance | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 08:31:12 -0700 (PDT) |
In the comments on this topic, I am missing the children. Why are the children going places where they are not supposed to be? What do the children think about the neighbors' complaints about their behavior? What do they think is fair? Have the children internalized the attitude that other adults are wrong and they can do as they please? Or their mother pleases? Are there any consequences or rewards for behavior? At Takoma Village, it became common for children to have different rules for being inside the common house. Some could not be trusted to take care of furniture or the TV at ages when other children were fully responsible. Allowing children to be in common spaces without an adult is very different than allowing children outside in a single-family home. They will be in a space with several other children and many other rules or expectations of both adults and children. Everyone has to figure out how to negotiate this. If the offended child-returners don’t want to participate in discussions, why not have the discussions with the adults who will participate? In family therapy, help is not refused because some members of the family won’t participate. Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Riderwood Village, Silver Spring MD Formerly of Takoma Village, Washington DC
-
Preventing cohousing neighborly awareness from becoming surveillance Melanie Mindlin, October 12 2025
- Re: Preventing cohousing neighborly awareness from becoming surveillance Sharon Villines, October 13 2025
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.