| Re: Governance, safety, and responding to ICE: a caution about Common House “policy” | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: b farris (btgf |
|
| Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 09:24:51 -0800 (PST) | |
This can be helpful: ACLU's Protest Safety, Know Your Rights and De-Escalation Training WHEN: 1/9/26 at 8 PM ET WHERE: On Zoom [RSVP for the link] https://act.aclu.org/a/aclukyr > On Jan 9, 2026, at 6:57 AM, Pare Gerou via Cohousing-L <cohousing-l [at] > cohousing.org> wrote: > > I’ve been thinking about the killing of Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis > this week by an ICE agent. > > With that in mind, I want to gently revisit the conversations a few months > ago about adopting a community “policy” (by consensus or sociocracy) about > how to handle interactions with ICE or other state/federal actors in the > common house. The well meaning policy we discussed earlier was designed to > reflect the community's dissatisfaction with ICE and deportation programs > and to protect any neighbors. > > I mentioned at the time that my concern isn’t the values behind these > policies—I understand the intent. It’s that cohousing consensus or > sociocratic *policy-making is often the wrong tool to govern behavior for a > fast-moving, high-risk external power dynamic with federal or state > officials*. It can create a false sense of control and understanding, lock > a group into rigidity, and unintentionally increase legal or safety risk. > > I’ve seen communities do better by focusing on values statements and > preparedness instead: agreed principles, member education, a clear safety > plan, a designated response team and representative, and a relationship > with competent legal counsel. However, once the knock on the door of the > Common House arrives, or perhaps at your own house, you need the > flexibility to respond wisely and flexibly in real time rather than relying > on a consensus policy that everyone feels bound to in the moment. > > Sharing this with humility, and in the spirit of keeping each other safer > and more effective. As someone who spent time representing people who were > facing deportation, I did not believe at the time that the person bringing > the Common House policy to the floor understood the gravity of what can go > wrong. > > Perhaps this moment provides an opportunity to reflect on what can go > wrong. We don't know what went through Renee Good's mind, and it is not > the same situation as a Common House policy, but the best way to keep your > entire community safe is not to create a policy where neighbors feel > emboldened not to open the door of the Common House for federal enforcement > officials- no matter how illegal or wrong you feel their actions might be. > This will not protect your neighbor. Fight these actions another day and > another way. > > [image: __tpx__] > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://L.cohousing.org/info > > >
-
Governance, safety, and responding to ICE: a caution about Common House “policy” Pare Gerou, January 9 2026
- Re: Governance, safety, and responding to ICE: a caution about Common House “policy” b farris, January 9 2026
- Re: Governance, safety, and responding to ICE: a caution about Common House “policy” Courtney Overby, January 9 2026
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.