| Governance, safety, and responding to ICE: a caution about Common House “policy” | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Pare Gerou (paregerou |
|
| Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 06:57:41 -0800 (PST) | |
I’ve been thinking about the killing of Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis this week by an ICE agent. With that in mind, I want to gently revisit the conversations a few months ago about adopting a community “policy” (by consensus or sociocracy) about how to handle interactions with ICE or other state/federal actors in the common house. The well meaning policy we discussed earlier was designed to reflect the community's dissatisfaction with ICE and deportation programs and to protect any neighbors. I mentioned at the time that my concern isn’t the values behind these policies—I understand the intent. It’s that cohousing consensus or sociocratic *policy-making is often the wrong tool to govern behavior for a fast-moving, high-risk external power dynamic with federal or state officials*. It can create a false sense of control and understanding, lock a group into rigidity, and unintentionally increase legal or safety risk. I’ve seen communities do better by focusing on values statements and preparedness instead: agreed principles, member education, a clear safety plan, a designated response team and representative, and a relationship with competent legal counsel. However, once the knock on the door of the Common House arrives, or perhaps at your own house, you need the flexibility to respond wisely and flexibly in real time rather than relying on a consensus policy that everyone feels bound to in the moment. Sharing this with humility, and in the spirit of keeping each other safer and more effective. As someone who spent time representing people who were facing deportation, I did not believe at the time that the person bringing the Common House policy to the floor understood the gravity of what can go wrong. Perhaps this moment provides an opportunity to reflect on what can go wrong. We don't know what went through Renee Good's mind, and it is not the same situation as a Common House policy, but the best way to keep your entire community safe is not to create a policy where neighbors feel emboldened not to open the door of the Common House for federal enforcement officials- no matter how illegal or wrong you feel their actions might be. This will not protect your neighbor. Fight these actions another day and another way. [image: __tpx__]
-
Governance, safety, and responding to ICE: a caution about Common House “policy” Pare Gerou, January 9 2026
-
Re: Governance, safety, and responding to ICE: a caution about Common House “policy” b farris, January 9 2026
- Re: Governance, safety, and responding to ICE: a caution about Common House “policy” Courtney Overby, January 9 2026
-
Re: Governance, safety, and responding to ICE: a caution about Common House “policy” b farris, January 9 2026
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.