| Ongoing insurability concerns for cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Cheryl Keil (cheryl.keil.wc18 |
|
| Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2026 18:30:53 -0700 (PDT) | |
We at Wasatch Commons in Salt Lake City recently had to go on a search for a new Master Policy insurer (our previous insurer stopped covering COAs altogether). In our search we had 4 insurance companies/brokers tell us they would not consider us because we were a cohousing development. The insurance industry's lack of familiarity with cohousing + the idea of being "self managed and self maintained" did not appeal to them. We were considered too much of a wild card. I brought this up in a similar email to cohousing-L a few months ago and remember getting feedback from one responder stating "we don't tell insurance companies we're a cohousing community; we just tell them we're a condo association". Our management team intends to take the same approach but we're wondering how far we need to distance ourselves from the "cohousing" label. Are other communities considering removing the word cohousing from their name, websites, etc in an effort to look more like other "normal" condo associations? We obviously want to maintain the traditions and culture but if the word "cohousing" is going to put us in jeopardy with our insurance and mortgages, then we are wondering how far we need to go to adjust. Thanks in advance for your feedback, Cheryl Keil Wasatch Commons
-
Ongoing insurability concerns for cohousing Cheryl Keil, July 1 2026
- Re: Ongoing insurability concerns for cohousing b farris, July 1 2026
-
Re: Ongoing insurability concerns for cohousing Sharon Villines, July 1 2026
- Re: Ongoing insurability concerns for cohousing b farris, July 1 2026
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.