intentional communities and cohousing differences | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (Exchange) (Robsan![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 1995 11:06:57 -0600 |
Mike of planet boulder did a nice job of summarizing Intentional Communities in a previous message. I would only comment that in my neck of the woods, being defined as WA and OR, the IC's tend to be developed organically over time rather than planned out and built all at once, tend to be built by the residents rather than paid professional contractors, and also tend to be relatively to considerabily lower income than typical built all at once cohousing projects. The average living expense that I see in the situations available ads in the NICA newsletter runs between $3-500 per month. That's for room, food, etc. My understanding is that typical cohousing mortgages run in the $7-900 a month range, and that's just for the mortgage, food, utilities and the rest are obviously more. I know of Mortgages in Cohousing requiring payments of $1200 a month, hardly low income. And since Cohousing is so closely tied to commerical banks, they screen out anyone who doesn;t have the income levels, or approved work situations. >From listening to three years of comments from players on all sides of the discussions the difference in income requirements, defined often in terms of class issues, is one of the major division points between cohousing and other types of intentional communities. This division is only one of several within the movement as whole, and there is a whole history of various types of communities ranking on others, sometimes subtly, sometimes directly. It seems to be a standard human issue to beleive that YOUR system is the best one, thus others are inferior in some way. I remember at one gathering where a religous commune was waving its flag really high, and a feminist community very gently, but directly nailed them for being patriarchial and sexist. Both sides didn't have much to say to each other after that, although the lunch discussion about the general issue of patriarchy in community was worth listening to! Anyway, the point of all this I want to make is that cohousing is only one form of community out there and if you find it does not appeal to you, don't give up on community, look into the other alternatives. The Fellowship for Intentional Community (FIC) publishes an excellent quarterly magazine called communities, (I would think it was excellent, even if I didn't write for it), and they also just published a directory of intentional communities available post paid for $23 from Directory, RT 4 box 169-r Louisa, VA 23093. Rob Sandelin Northwest Intentional Communities Associaiton Sharingwood
-
intentional communities and cohousing differences Rob Sandelin (Exchange), December 11 1995
- Re: intentional communities and cohousing differences MelaSilva, December 11 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.