Cohousing-L Mailing List: research on self selection

research on self selection	<– Date –> <– Thread –>
From: Hans Tilstra (hanstilstrarabbit.com.au)
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 19:53:34 -0600 (MDT)

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_001C_01BF0CC8.C657D260
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

the discussion thread on inclusion & exclusion in cohousing reminded me =
of Iannaccone's research:

Source: Laurence Iannaccone (1992) "Sacrifice and Stigma: Reducing =
Free-riding in Cults, Communes, and Other Collectives" Journal of =
Political Economy, Volume 100, No 2.=20

Summary: Some successful groups have requirements and seemingly =
inefficient prohibitions to the benefit of (perfectly rational) members. =
Examples would include the Jehova's Witnesses who benefit from stigma, =
self-sacrifice and bizarre behavioural restrictions as a means of =
self-selection.

So, this research suggests there is merit in a degree of thresholding to =
achieve success in joint ventures.=20

Applied to cohousing; the difficulties in the process of bringing groups =
together becomes an investment that pays off when the group is =
established. Conversely, if the process is skipped (eg. a commercial =
developer does all the work), the outcome may not work as well.

Hans
www.vicnet.net.au/~cohouse




------=_NextPart_000_001C_01BF0CC8.C657D260
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2014.210" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT face=3DVerdana size=3D2>the discussion thread on inclusion =
&amp;=20
exclusion in cohousing reminded me of Iannaccone's =
research:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DVerdana size=3D2>Source: Laurence Iannaccone (1992) =
"<EM>Sacrifice=20
and Stigma: Reducing Free-riding in Cults, Communes, and Other =
Collectives</EM>"=20
<U>Journal of Political Economy</U>, Volume 100, No 2. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DVerdana size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DVerdana size=3D2>Summary: Some successful groups=20
have&nbsp;requirements and seemingly inefficient prohibitions to the =
benefit=20
of&nbsp;(perfectly rational) members. Examples would include the =
Jehova's=20
Witnesses who benefit from stigma, self-sacrifice and bizarre=20
behavioural&nbsp;restrictions as a means of self-selection.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DVerdana size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DVerdana size=3D2>So,&nbsp;this =
research&nbsp;suggests&nbsp;there=20
is merit in a degree of thresholding&nbsp;to achieve success in joint =
ventures.=20
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DVerdana size=3D2>Applied to cohousing; the =
difficulties in the=20
process of bringing groups together becomes an investment that pays off =
when the=20
group is established. Conversely, if the process is skipped (eg. a =
commercial=20
developer does all the work), the outcome may not work as =
well.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DVerdana size=3D2>Hans</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DVerdana size=3D2><A=20
href=3D"http://www.vicnet.net.au/~cohouse";>www.vicnet.net.au/~cohouse</A>=
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_001C_01BF0CC8.C657D260--

research on self selection Hans Tilstra, October 1 1999
- Re: research on self selection Bitner/Stevenson, October 1 1999

Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.