Re: Exercise in custom home design or exercise in community? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Kay Argyle (argylemines.utah.edu) | |
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 17:33:30 -0700 (MST) |
> The word "cohousing" seems to have filtered out into the ether and is > attracting a wide range of people who are all attaching their own meanings > to the word. Once in a while somebody utters the Big Threat, "But it won't be cohousing if we don't --" [have X number of common meals per week, disallow private yards, recycle, do all the work ourselves, get rid of all our extra possessions]. We'll be -- tones of horror -- "just another condominium." Different communities seem to take varying approaches with "add-on" values such as environmentalism, sweat equity, common land, or voluntary simplicity, that don't necessarily reflect the core definition of cohousing. My understanding, in joining Wasatch Commons, was that "cohousing" meant a community designed to foster interaction among its residents -- but a nursing home with a good recreation director does that. It was exactly the chance to define my own community (to attach my own meaning) that I was attracted to. > Is it really taken as a given by most cohousing group members that they > will be able to have their own custom-designed house? ... > What *kind* of customizing was considered important to your group? ... > Why was it not possible to discuss these wants > and needs during the programming phase and come up with a variety of plans > that met everyone's needs? Was the cost of the customization ever > discussed? Did it ever become an issue for some group members? We didn't belong to the group during programming. I'm sure the design, and the options offered, reflected the members of the time. Even so, most tweaked this or that in their own place, moved walls, changed doorways, etc. "Community" was an untried concept. On the basis of a promise that might not materialize, we accepted a house we wouldn't have otherwise considered and attempted to mitigate its drawbacks. We sacrificed location. I've got a two-hour commute. The nearest grocery stores are shabby, badly stocked, and a long walk away. It's got no front yard. We're in a flood plain between a river and a canal, and the house is built below grade. The day they put in the central path and we saw that it was higher than our front porch, my roommate sat on the curb and cried. The things we tried to fix were (a) we were combining two households' worth of stuff, and the place had less storage than any single-bedroom apartment I've ever lived in -- add storage (the biggest changes, some of them structural), (b) it was going to be as dark as a train tunnel, and we both get winter depression -- enlarge windows and add lights, (c) the number of outlets was the legal minimum required by the building codes -- more outlets and phone jacks, (d) on the unanimous advice of every contractor we talked to at a home show -- change the open-loop radiant heating to closed-loop. We discussed a three-bedroom unit instead, but the cost quoted for the customization still came in below the three-bedroom, and the only one still available had little privacy. Some of the changes could have been done later. It seemed silly and wasteful to pay for new construction, with the intention of immediately ripping it apart, pulling out doors and windows that you just paid hundreds of dollars for and sending them to the dump as construction debris, and then living with it torn apart for months and years -- it also sounded stressful. I grew up in a house being remodeled, I don't recommend it. Our customization became an issue partly because of being done so late in the game. The alterations to the other units were in the original drawings that the contractor got, and mistakes were minor, whereas our foundations were poured wrong, the plumbing was wrong, the roof trusses were the wrong pitch, the windows were framed wrong. It caused delays, with interest on the project loan piling up daily. The building committee still get tightlipped and testy when reminded of it. On the other hand, too often we felt like there were guilt-tripping and covert power games going on, which just made us less inclined to be meekly accepting. (It isn't "voluntary simplicity" when it's demanded of you.) Cost-cuts made just before we joined weren't in the plans we saw, and nobody could or would tell us what they were (information flow has been a major problem for Wasatch). We found out about them one at a time as the house went up, each one a jolt. As I told someone at the time, on good days I felt like I was moving to Oz, on bad days it was Airstrip One (George Orwell/1984). When I'm feeling like I was out of my mind to move here, and I retreat into my house to lick my wounds and try to remember why I wanted to do this, it doesn't help that I am looking at a carpet that I didn't want in the first place for health reasons, disliked from the first time I laid eyes on the carpet sample, was required to pick out from four equally grim alternatives, and cannot afford to replace. That carpet is a symbol and an on-going sore spot. Kay Argyle Wasatch Commons
- RE: Exercise in custom home design or exercise in community?, (continued)
- RE: Exercise in custom home design or exercise in community? Rob Sandelin, February 18 2000
- Re: Exercise in custom home design or exercise in community? Howard Landman, February 18 2000
- Re: Exercise in custom home design or exercise in community? Diane Simpson, February 18 2000
- Re: Exercise in custom home design or exercise in community? RowenaHC, February 19 2000
- Re: Exercise in custom home design or exercise in community? Kay Argyle, February 25 2000
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.