Re: Co-housing Sustainability | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Ed Lantz (elantz![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 22:45:19 -0700 (MST) |
"Rob Sandelin" <floriferous [at] msn.com> writes >Maggi asked the question that currently defines my life work: How can we >support and encourage the same level of community bonding and trust for >people who are moving into cohousing communities that are already built? > >This is, in my opinion, the key question of sustainability. If you can >continue to build relationships, surf through the conflicts, do things for >each other to show that you care about each other, then your community, of >whatever kind, will sustain itself. So what are the actions that build >community bonding and trust? This is a great topic to brainstorm within your >group at a retreat setting. Each group will find its own answers, the key, >is to ask the question. I spoke to a friend that was raised in a Mormon cohousing community that thrived for 30 years, and he had some very interesting insights that I had not considered. His parent's community was incorporated via a land trust. Since everyone was of "like mind," things ran very smoothly. The problems arose when, years later, their children began inheriting property. The trust routinely screened new community members to maintain the character of the community (the advantage of a trust). Technically they could also deny an inheritance as an un-approved transfer of ownership, preferring instead to pay the inheritor what they believed to be "fair market value" for their property. Some community members, however, had invested substantially in improvements to their dwellings before passing away, a factor that was not taken into consideration by the trust. Children that knew they did not fit in and simply wanted to sell, clashed with the trust over financial issues and ownership rights. Some rogue children wanted to keep their dwelling even though they had little in common with their parent's vision and the community's values. The lawsuits began to fly and eventually destroyed the community entirely. When planning a community it is difficult to think 30-years down the road, but it is obviously necessary to do so. I would be curious to know how others have dealt with the issue of inheritance and the inevitable dilution of original community values as the community ages and children replace their parents. Ed Lantz elantz [at] spitzinc.com
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.