Re: Community and Boundaries | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: lilbert (lilbert![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 12:48:38 -0700 (MST) |
> > BUT the issue of having a restricted email discussion list has become > entwined with the "enclave" issue. We have a list to which anyone can > subscribe. It has 119 members while we have about 49 adult members. We do > not approve or even know who these people are when they join. > > The issues are around personal data (addresses, phone numbers, etc.), team > meeting minutes, announcements of vacations or hospitalizations, mortgage > info, etc. going out on the main list. Many feel the need for something > limited to members and a few other people who are active in the community > one way or another (significant others, for example). But the fear is that > everything will become private and segregated. Private is fine. We need privacy! Segregated? I think that if you remain open to the outside community, you don't need to worry about it. I don't see any reason at all why an email list should contain non-members. You don't send your personal email to strangers, why should your group? -- Liz Stevenson Southside Park Cohousing Sacramento, California
-
Re:Community and Boundaries Sharon Villines, November 1 2000
- Re: Community and Boundaries lilbert, November 1 2000
- Re: Community and Boundaries Stephen Spencer, November 1 2000
- Re: Re:Community and Boundaries Robyn Williams, November 1 2000
- Re: Community and Boundaries lance millward, November 1 2000
- Re: Community and Boundaries Sharon Villines, November 2 2000
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.