Re: Community and Boundaries | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharonvillines![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 07:08:31 -0700 (MST) |
> I was trying to explain to someone about the lack of evidence of > indigenous culture in the New Zealand landscape, and they responded by > saying that landscape was not about control or ownership but about > connection with the land. This seems to be true of all indigenous cultures. Conquering heroes or new religions declare ownership and banishment. But the complexity of indigenous cultures, as well as their ethical concerns are also very low--romanticism aside. Scientific development depends on democratic and judicial systems to protect the process of education and investigation. > I wonder to, if personal, family and community space is really defined > by the degree of connection we feel with that space rather than > ownership over it. I was hoping for this kind of theoretical discussion about communications. I was wondering if concerns about having any boundaries at all (there is no personal space) are somehow related to feelings of connectedness. Not wanting connectedness to develop? Indigenous cultures were very connected but they were also very private--there were very few per square inch. It didn't take much to be alone. No barriers were needed in daily life -- only occasional raids from a neighboring village. Sharon -- Sharon Villines In Washington, DC where all roads lead to Casablanca Takoma Village Cohousing http://www.takomavillage.org http://www.cohousing.org
- Re: Community and Boundaries, (continued)
- Re: Community and Boundaries lilbert, November 1 2000
- Re: Community and Boundaries Stephen Spencer, November 1 2000
- Re: Re:Community and Boundaries Robyn Williams, November 1 2000
- Re: Community and Boundaries lance millward, November 1 2000
- Re: Community and Boundaries Sharon Villines, November 2 2000
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.