Re: Community and Boundaries | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Stephen Spencer (spencer![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 14:53:53 -0700 (MST) |
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000 lilbert [at] earthlink.net wrote: > > BUT the issue of having a restricted email discussion list has become > > entwined with the "enclave" issue. We have a list to which anyone can > > subscribe. It has 119 members while we have about 49 adult members. We do > > not approve or even know who these people are when they join. Why not have two lists; a "public" list that anyone can join, and a "private" list to which only members can subscribe? There appears to be a place for both in your community. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stephen N. Spencer Graphics System Engineer ACM SIGGRAPH Director for Publications The University of Washington 206.616.3281 spencer [at] cs.washington.edu ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- "After ecstasy, laundry." -- Zen writing "The truth is that progress is usually small and sneaky." -- Anne Lamott "What is maddening is the terrible notion that a person's value depends on how important and financially successful they are, and that this is measured in terms of money." -- Tim Berners-Lee
-
Re:Community and Boundaries Sharon Villines, November 1 2000
- Re: Community and Boundaries lilbert, November 1 2000
- Re: Community and Boundaries Stephen Spencer, November 1 2000
- Re: Re:Community and Boundaries Robyn Williams, November 1 2000
- Re: Community and Boundaries lance millward, November 1 2000
- Re: Community and Boundaries Sharon Villines, November 2 2000
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.