RE: Consensus and the Concept of Blocking
From: Rob Sandelin (floriferousmsn.com)
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 19:29:00 -0700 (MST)
 I have seen lots of dysfunctional behaviors, where people block an entire
group of people because they want the attention of the group, or because
they are pissed off and stopping the whole group is a way to get revenge. In
these situations, and in other times of dysfunction, having a voting backup
keeps your group functioning. I have witnessed bizarre behaviors from people
who are "getting divorced" from a community. You can try to mediate, but if
they won't participate, the best you can sometimes do is to protect your
self and your community. It is sad when a community goes through something
like this, but it does not have to destroy your ability to make agreements.

It would be wonderful if everybody was reasonable and well adjusted, but it
seems that is not always the case, and having a way to keep yourself from
being damaged from direct assaults on your process is like having
catastrophic health insurance. You hope you never need it, but if you do, it
will save you lots of resources.

Under normal group circumstances, voting probably will not be an issue you
have to deal with if you have a well functioning consensus process. For some
groups however, consensus is a mistake.

Rob Sandelin

-----Original Message-----
From: cohousing-l-admin [at] cohousing.org
[mailto:cohousing-l-admin [at] cohousing.org]On Behalf Of Sharon Villines
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 2:07 PM
To: cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org
Subject: [C-L]_Consensus and the Concept of Blocking


> There is also a very important function of having a backup. It makes
people
> more cooperative. If I know that I can't stop the group just by blocking
> consensus, and that they will outvote me at a future meeting, then even
the
> most uncooperative person is likely to make some moves towards compromise,
> because they know they will simply get outvoted a couple meetings down the
> road.

It makes sense, if only to satisfy the bank, to have a back up voting
procedure established to cover impossible situations that could occur.

But in general I find the concept of  "blocking" to be meaningless.

Whether consensus is defined as either full agreement or the absence of
objection, there is no consensus until there is full agreement or no
objections. No one can block what doesn't exist.

The lack of consensus means the group has not found a solution (or explained
it adequately) for everyone to feel comfortable with it. To view someone who
disagrees as uncooperative is to disparage the position of that person.
Those who are agreeing are just as uncooperative from the objector's point
of view.

To hold that the one person is the uncooperative person, not the majority is
an attitude that is not part of the _spirit_ of consensus. Once you start
thinking this way, you are in the majority rules system.

The other reason for having a back up voting and majority rules system in
place is that consensus requires that the group have shared goals. There
comes a time when the group does not have shared goals, the majority vote
essentially splits the group or splits off a small minority. It would seem
that sometimes this would be necessary and a mechanism in place to do it.

After a majority vote in a cohousing community, I can't imagine continuing
as before. It would be broken. Perhaps fixable, but definitely broken.

Sharon
--
Sharon Villines
Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC
http://www.takomavillage.org


_______________________________________________
Cohousing-L mailing list
Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org  Unsubscribe  and other info:
http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.332 / Virus Database: 186 - Release Date: 3/6/02

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.332 / Virus Database: 186 - Release Date: 3/6/02

_______________________________________________
Cohousing-L mailing list
Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org  Unsubscribe  and other info:
http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l

Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.