RE: Committee in trouble | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Martie Weatherly (martiew![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 00:20:02 -0600 (MDT) |
> My question is, How does a community help a committee which is stuck? > > Becky (from Sonora) Becky and Grant, I am responding to the list because I think this in an interesting situation for us all to learn something. >From Cheryl Charvis-Graves (from a different community): > When we have an ad hoc > group working on something, we have them start off with a set of standards > and criteria by which they are working. The degree of screening would be > included in that set of standards and criteria. The committee has to have > that guidance from the community as a whole, it seems to me. If the > committee is not sure, they get feedback from the community to check and see > if they are on track. I totally agree with this. I think this may be the weak point in your process that has allowed you to be going around and around about this for months. In our community, there have been times where we have had to take a step back and sit together and decide what is really important This doesn't mean just brainstorming solutions, it means sharing the feel of the place, how it looks, what's important to each of you, how it sounds. Then we prioritized the criteria, weighted them, lumped them together. And came up with a direction to the team. > So, one question is how to reach compromise when one "need" is framed in a > way that categorically prevents another need from being met? > From Grant > Sonora Compromise has a sense that each side is "giving in." I encourage you to work with your community to seek the "wisdom of the group." You may need to do a sharing circle first to get all the frustrations and upset out about how long this has taken. Some facilitation exercises where you switch points of view are great for lightening up. Always relate your criteria and your discussion back to your mission statement, and keep looking to see how it relates. Consensus is not "giving in", it is working together in a group. Once you have clear direction to your team, it will be much easier for them to come up with a solution. And you can lighten the load further by adopting a solution for six months on a trial basis. Amazing how that releases the tension. Good luck, and let us know how it works out. Martie Weatherly Liberty Village martiew [at] earthlink.net PS I would also think it high priority to meet head-on the "strained relationships" on the team from this. You need to figure out a way to defuse that and get back in relationship. Oh boy, conflict - an opportunity for growth! _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
RE: Committee in trouble Martie Weatherly, July 19 2002
-
Building trust in teams (was helping stuck committee) Rob Sandelin, July 22 2002
-
Re: Building trust in teams (was helping stuck committee) Sharon Villines, July 22 2002
- RE: Building trust in teams (was helping stuck committee) Rob Sandelin, July 22 2002
-
Re: Building trust in teams (was helping stuck committee) Sharon Villines, July 22 2002
-
Building trust in teams (was helping stuck committee) Rob Sandelin, July 22 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.