RE: Sociocracy and Consensus | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (floriferous![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 20:30:03 -0700 (MST) |
Aha. It is becoming clearer. I think. let me see if I can feed it back what I think I understand by using a community example. For example, in my community, there are 6 teams that have specific areas of interest, including a oversight team (Board of directors). At a "general meeting" using sociocracy, there are at a minimum, 2 elected people from each team required and expected to be at the meeting and to represent their team in the consensus decisions. If I am not an elected person, I can still go to the general meeting, and I still have a voice, but I am not "expected" to go. So, if I am one of the elected people on the commonhouse team I am charged with representing that team to the meeting. Sort of a representational consensus process? SO rather than everyone in a community showing up to the general meeting you have a minimum of 12 that show up, and anybody else who wants to. And the majority of who shows up has been elected by their neighbors, thus proving their desirably-trust ability for representing me. If I have it more of less right, then this seems like a formalized structure for what happens informally. If I don't go to the meeting, but my team has a proposal, then I trust that whomever on the team that is there will represent the team. The elections process seems to be one of validating those who are willing to put energy into the system. So, if I have got this now, What happens if I am one of the not very involved members of the community? It seems if I was seldom involved, my neighbors would not choose to elect me. This is what happens anyway, If I am not involved I don't come, and even if you vote me in, I may still choose not to come. I assume there is equality in decision voice between those elected representative and those who just show up, or is this not the case? Rob Sandelin South Snohomish County at the headwaters of Ricci Creek Sky Valley Environments <http://www.nonprofitpages.com/nica/SVE.htm> Field skills training for student naturalists Floriferous [at] msn.com --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.332 / Virus Database: 186 - Release Date: 3/6/02 _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
- RE: Sociocracy and Consensus, (continued)
- RE: Sociocracy and Consensus steve boylan, March 31 2003
- Re: Sociocracy and Consensus Sharon Villines, March 31 2003
- Re: Sociocracy and Consensus Alan Bleier, March 31 2003
- Re: Sociocracy and Consensus Sharon Villines, March 31 2003
- RE: Sociocracy and Consensus Rob Sandelin, March 31 2003
- Re: Sociocracy and Consensus Sharon Villines, March 31 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.