Consenus and Practical decision making | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Ellen Orleans (ellen![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 15:05:15 -0600 (MDT) |
At Wild Sage (under construction, 34 homes), we combine several forms of decision-making, depending upon what is most appropriate. For instance, the Process Team sets Meeting agendas without the whole group reaching consensus about it. This may seem obvious, but it illustrates just one of the hundreds of decisions that a group makes without consensus. Often we delegate decisions to teams or entrust a member with a single decision, such as whether to move our meetings from a church basement to college cafeteria. When decisions come down to personal taste, sometimes we use super-majority, which means we need 80% support to pass a decision. However, by far the most important aspect of consensus is using it properly. A group needs to clearly define what a yes vote means, just as they define Standing Aside and Blocking. Our group has added a neutral or "whatever" vote, which carries a different tone than standing aside. Blocking is often the most difficult part of consensus. At Wild Sage, a block is only legitimate if the person blocking believes that the decision goes against the community vision. The Steering Team decides whether a block is legitimate. Speaking of community vision, it is in some ways similar to the faith component of a Quaker Meeting. Does your community have a strong vision statement? When is the last time you revisited it? Becky, you wrote <<It's not uncommon for people to want decisions to be made in a timely manner.>> This is true. To make this happen, I say delegate, delegate, delegate. By delegating decisions to teams you gain at least three benefits. 1) You often reach decisions more quickly and efficiently. 2) Those people who are truly concerned with a decision's outcome can join the team or subcommittee making the decision. That way, the process doesn't drain the larger group's energy by forcing members to sit through debates on matters they don't particularly care about. 3) Your community builds trust. Members learn that most of the time a team or committee will make a decision that works well for the group, that most everyone can live with. As trust grows, community work can be spread out. This spares community energy and lifts sprits. Hope this is helpful, Ellen Orleans Wild Sage Cohousing (4 homes left for sale, don't miss out....) Wonderland Hill _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
-
Consenus and Practical decision making Ellen Orleans, September 11 2003
-
Re: Consenus and Practical decision making aamato, September 11 2003
- Re: Consenus and Practical decision making Sharon Villines, September 13 2003
- Re: Consenus and Practical decision making Fred H Olson, September 14 2003
-
Re: Consenus and Practical decision making aamato, September 11 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.