Paying babysitters- the legalities | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Lynn Nadeau (welcome![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 12:11:08 -0600 (MDT) |
Having survived the scary potential of one hair-raising potential-liability-suit situation, at RoseWind we are very careful about "employees." As a community, we have a stated value on supporting young children and their families, and nobody objects to the community as a whole paying sitters for meetings. But our accountant says we are opening ourselves to liability if our annual budget has a line item that says "childcare $400", or if an investigator could even track down and show that in fact RoseWind was really paying a sitter, even if we decide to make it less obvious by calling it "children's activities" or decide to give the kid team money to steward for sitting somehow. We want a system which spreads the cost evenly among the members, and which is easy. Passing a hat at meetings does neither, as we don't usually carry cash to the common house, and that would also suggest that some people would pay and others would not. What do others do? Lynn Nadeau, RoseWind Cohousing Port Townsend Washington (Victorian seaport, music, art, nature) http://www.rosewind.org http://www.ptguide.com http://www.ptforpeace.info (very active peace movement here- see our photo) _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
-
Paying babysitters- the legalities Lynn Nadeau, September 12 2003
- Re: Paying babysitters- the legalities Elizabeth Stevenson, September 12 2003
- Re: Paying babysitters- the legalities Sharon Villines, September 13 2003
- Re: Paying babysitters- the legalities Robert Heinich, September 12 2003
- Re: Paying babysitters- the legalities Becky Schaller, September 13 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.